| IJJ | TMDV | IJJ / TMDV | |
| Gain YTD | 5.054 | 1.706 | 296% |
| Net Assets | 7.82B | 4.21M | 185,860% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.35 | 51% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 21.00 | 190% |
| Yield | 1.71 | 2.85 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| IJJ | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 50% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJJ has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJJ jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that TMDV and SOLV have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMDV and SOLV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMDV | 100% | N/A | ||
| SOLV - TMDV | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| GRC - TMDV | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CBSH - TMDV | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| UBSI - TMDV | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
| MKC - TMDV | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||