| IJJ | MYLD | IJJ / MYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 8.360 | 11.228 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 8.08B | 16.3M | 49,583% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.09 | 17% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 51.00 | 78% |
| Yield | 1.66 | 5.64 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 2 years | - |
| IJJ | MYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJJ has been closely correlated with TKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJJ jumps, then TKR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that MYLD and M have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MYLD and M's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYLD | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| M - MYLD | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| GDEN - MYLD | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| SBDS - MYLD | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| PRDO - MYLD | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| BKE - MYLD | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||