Advertisement
IIPZF vs RSHPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IIPZF is a Hold and RSHPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IIPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRSHPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IIPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RSHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IIPZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSHPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IIPZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- RSHPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IIPZF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -0.69% price change this week, while RSHPF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.81%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.20% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| IIPZF | RSHPF | IIPZF / RSHPF | |
| Capitalization | 1.36B | 603M | 225% |
| EBITDA | -123.94M | 56.1M | -221% |
| Gain YTD | 36.322 | 21.053 | 173% |
| P/E Ratio | 52.21 | 17.61 | 296% |
| Revenue | 248M | 85.1M | 291% |
| Total Cash | 3.45M | 7.29M | 47% |
| Total Debt | 1.73B | 558M | 310% |
IIPZF | RSHPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RSHPF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as IIPZF (25). This means that RSHPF’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.
RSHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as IIPZF (100). This means that RSHPF’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.
RSHPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as IIPZF (95). This means that RSHPF’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.
IIPZF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as RSHPF (55). This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to RSHPF’s over the last 12 months.
IIPZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSHPF (63). This means that IIPZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSHPF’s over the last 12 months.
| IIPZF | RSHPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 25% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 30% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 25% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 28% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 31% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 47% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | N/A |
Advertisement
IIPZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IIPZF and BOWFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IIPZF and BOWFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IIPZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIPZF | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| BOWFF - IIPZF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| PPRQF - IIPZF | 24% Poorly correlated | +6.75% | ||
| RSHPF - IIPZF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RIOCF - IIPZF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| CWYUF - IIPZF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||
RSHPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RSHPF and IIPZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSHPF and IIPZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RSHPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSHPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IIPZF - RSHPF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| LAREF - RSHPF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PPRQF - RSHPF | 3% Poorly correlated | +6.75% | ||
| RIOCF - RSHPF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| RFNDF - RSHPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||