IIPZF
Price
$9.59
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IRT
Price
$17.07
Change
-$0.07 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.1B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IIPZF vs IRT

Header iconIIPZF vs IRT Comparison
Open Charts IIPZF vs IRTBanner chart's image
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$9.59
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$700
Capitalization1.34B
Independence Realty Trust
Price$17.07
Change-$0.07 (-0.41%)
Volume$39.02K
Capitalization4.1B
IIPZF vs IRT Comparison Chart in %
IIPZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IIPZF vs. IRT commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IIPZF is a Hold and IRT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (IIPZF: $9.59 vs. IRT: $17.15)
Brand notoriety: IIPZF and IRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IIPZF: 83% vs. IRT: 81%
Market capitalization -- IIPZF: $1.34B vs. IRT: $4.1B
IIPZF [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $1.34B. IRT’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $4.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $25.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IIPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IIPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IIPZF is a better buy in the long-term than IRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IIPZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IIPZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IIPZF is a better buy in the short-term than IRT.

Price Growth

IIPZF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IRT (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

IRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (+0.76% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRT($4.1B) has a higher market cap than IIPZF($1.34B). IRT has higher P/E ratio than IIPZF: IRT (190.56) vs IIPZF (52.21). IIPZF YTD gains are higher at: -0.083 vs. IRT (-1.888). IRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 339M vs. IIPZF (-45.04M). IIPZF has more cash in the bank: 3.17M vs. IRT (152K). IIPZF has less debt than IRT: IIPZF (1.74B) vs IRT (2.3B). IRT has higher revenues than IIPZF: IRT (652M) vs IIPZF (249M).
IIPZFIRTIIPZF / IRT
Capitalization1.34B4.1B33%
EBITDA-45.04M339M-13%
Gain YTD-0.083-1.8884%
P/E Ratio52.21190.5627%
Revenue249M652M38%
Total Cash3.17M152K2,087%
Total Debt1.74B2.3B76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IIPZF vs IRT: Fundamental Ratings
IIPZF
IRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
9289
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
714
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2675

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IIPZF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.

IRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IIPZF (100) in the null industry. This means that IRT’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.

IRT's SMR Rating (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IIPZF (92) in the null industry. This means that IRT’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.

IIPZF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.

IIPZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IIPZFIRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IIPZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGINX12.950.11
+0.86%
Goldman Sachs Global Infras Inv
PRNCX10.920.06
+0.55%
T. Rowe Price Intl Disciplined Eq Adv
LVAEX26.320.13
+0.50%
LSV Value Equity Investor
ARTKX54.710.10
+0.18%
Artisan International Value Investor
MEFNX7.48-0.02
-0.27%
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth R3

IIPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IIPZF and PPRQF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IIPZF and PPRQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IIPZF
1D Price
Change %
IIPZF100%
N/A
PPRQF - IIPZF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILPT - IIPZF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRFIF - IIPZF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSHPF - IIPZF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRT - IIPZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More

IRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRT has been closely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IRT jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRT
1D Price
Change %
IRT100%
+0.35%
UDR - IRT
86%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
CPT - IRT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
EQR - IRT
83%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
ESS - IRT
81%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
AVB - IRT
80%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
More