IIDDY
Price
$7.00
Change
-$0.03 (-0.43%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.7B
SLVDF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.01 (+4.35%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IIDDY vs SLVDF

Header iconIIDDY vs SLVDF Comparison
Open Charts IIDDY vs SLVDFBanner chart's image
IGO
Price$7.00
Change-$0.03 (-0.43%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization2.7B
Silver Dollar Resources
Price$0.24
Change+$0.01 (+4.35%)
Volume$130.47K
Capitalization13.82M
IIDDY vs SLVDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IIDDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IIDDY vs. SLVDF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IIDDY is a Hold and SLVDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (IIDDY: $7.00 vs. SLVDF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: IIDDY and SLVDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IIDDY: 248% vs. SLVDF: 224%
Market capitalization -- IIDDY: $2.7B vs. SLVDF: $13.82M
IIDDY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.7B. SLVDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IIDDY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IIDDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLVDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IIDDY and SLVDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IIDDY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IIDDY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLVDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVDF is a better buy in the short-term than IIDDY.

Price Growth

IIDDY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.85% price change this week, while SLVDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IIDDY($2.7B) has a higher market cap than SLVDF($13.8M). SLVDF YTD gains are higher at: 27.591 vs. IIDDY (16.473).
IIDDYSLVDFIIDDY / SLVDF
Capitalization2.7B13.8M19,594%
EBITDAN/A-1.12M-
Gain YTD16.47327.59160%
P/E Ratio997.98N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.01M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IIDDYSLVDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IIDDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGHYX38.510.23
+0.60%
Invesco Health Care Y
CIMFX26.95N/A
N/A
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F1
GSLAX16.58-0.02
-0.12%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
RMBGX37.08-0.14
-0.38%
RMB I
CTHRX108.53-0.82
-0.75%
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst2

IIDDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IIDDY and NBMFF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IIDDY and NBMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IIDDY
1D Price
Change %
IIDDY100%
-0.50%
NBMFF - IIDDY
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
NBRFF - IIDDY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVDF - IIDDY
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
KLDCF - IIDDY
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
LBSR - IIDDY
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
More

SLVDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVDF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVDF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVDF
1D Price
Change %
SLVDF100%
+4.63%
PGEZF - SLVDF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
AAGFF - SLVDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
AZZTF - SLVDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
ESKYF - SLVDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
GRSLF - SLVDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.07%
More