IHS
Price
$6.43
Change
-$0.45 (-6.54%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.16B
123 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMAX
Price
$7.69
Change
-$0.02 (-0.26%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
154.23M
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IHS vs RMAX

Header iconIHS vs RMAX Comparison
Open Charts IHS vs RMAXBanner chart's image
IHS Holding
Price$6.43
Change-$0.45 (-6.54%)
Volume$1.36M
Capitalization2.16B
Re/Max Holdings
Price$7.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.26%)
Volume$181.27K
Capitalization154.23M
IHS vs RMAX Comparison Chart in %
IHS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IHS vs. RMAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHS is a Buy and RMAX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (IHS: $6.43 vs. RMAX: $7.69)
Brand notoriety: IHS and RMAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IHS: 286% vs. RMAX: 100%
Market capitalization -- IHS: $2.16B vs. RMAX: $154.23M
IHS [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.16B. RMAX’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $154.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IHS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMAX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IHS and RMAX are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IHS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IHS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMAX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMAX is a better buy in the short-term than IHS.

Price Growth

IHS (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

IHS is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

RMAX is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.47% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHS($2.16B) has a higher market cap than RMAX($154M). RMAX has higher P/E ratio than IHS: RMAX (12.21) vs IHS (4.66). IHS YTD gains are higher at: 135.616 vs. RMAX (-27.741). RMAX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 69.4M vs. IHS (-979.69M). IHS has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. RMAX (94.3M). RMAX has less debt than IHS: RMAX (466M) vs IHS (3.83B). IHS has higher revenues than RMAX: IHS (1.73B) vs RMAX (298M).
IHSRMAXIHS / RMAX
Capitalization2.16B154M1,401%
EBITDA-979.69M69.4M-1,412%
Gain YTD135.616-27.741-489%
P/E Ratio4.6612.2138%
Revenue1.73B298M581%
Total Cash532M94.3M564%
Total Debt3.83B466M823%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMAX: Fundamental Ratings
RMAX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IHSRMAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IHS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIVAX20.660.19
+0.93%
American Funds International Vntg R-1
MRSHX26.660.13
+0.49%
MFS Research International R3
BRSDX15.280.04
+0.26%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq A
HSFNX28.38-0.03
-0.11%
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Investor
GITCX17.39-0.07
-0.40%
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps C

IHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHS has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IHS jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHS
1D Price
Change %
IHS100%
+2.23%
S - IHS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
LILA - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
TDS - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
RMAX - IHS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
LBRDK - IHS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
More

RMAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMAX has been loosely correlated with CWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMAX jumps, then CWK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMAX
1D Price
Change %
RMAX100%
-0.64%
CWK - RMAX
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
HOUS - RMAX
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
EXPI - RMAX
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
CBRE - RMAX
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
JLL - RMAX
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More