IHS
Price
$7.04
Change
+$0.08 (+1.15%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.36B
92 days until earnings call
NYC
Price
$11.89
Change
-$1.07 (-8.26%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
31.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IHS vs NYC

Header iconIHS vs NYC Comparison
Open Charts IHS vs NYCBanner chart's image
IHS Holding
Price$7.04
Change+$0.08 (+1.15%)
Volume$478.99K
Capitalization2.36B
American Strategic Investment
Price$11.89
Change-$1.07 (-8.26%)
Volume$748
Capitalization31.27M
IHS vs NYC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IHS vs. NYC commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHS is a Hold and NYC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (IHS: $7.04 vs. NYC: $11.89)
Brand notoriety: IHS and NYC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IHS: 62% vs. NYC: 17%
Market capitalization -- IHS: $2.36B vs. NYC: $31.27M
IHS [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.36B. NYC’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $31.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IHS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNYC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NYC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IHS and NYC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IHS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NYC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NYC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IHS is a better buy in the short-term than NYC.

Price Growth

IHS (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +5.86% price change this week, while NYC (@Real Estate Development) price change was -8.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

IHS is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHS($2.36B) has a higher market cap than NYC($31.3M). IHS YTD gains are higher at: 141.096 vs. NYC (40.048). IHS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 831M vs. NYC (-105.96M). IHS has more cash in the bank: 629M vs. NYC (7.08M). NYC has less debt than IHS: NYC (403M) vs IHS (3.96B). IHS has higher revenues than NYC: IHS (1.73B) vs NYC (58.4M).
IHSNYCIHS / NYC
Capitalization2.36B31.3M7,546%
EBITDA831M-105.96M-784%
Gain YTD141.09640.048352%
P/E Ratio21.33N/A-
Revenue1.73B58.4M2,967%
Total Cash629M7.08M8,880%
Total Debt3.96B403M982%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NYC: Fundamental Ratings
NYC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
36

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IHSNYC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKTI65.283.31
+5.34%
BK Technologies Corp
GLBE30.810.21
+0.69%
Global-E Online Ltd
BP34.330.19
+0.55%
BP plc
NMFC10.30-0.06
-0.58%
New Mountain Finance Corp
FMST2.48-0.11
-4.25%
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd

IHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IHS and LILA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IHS and LILA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHS
1D Price
Change %
IHS100%
+1.15%
LILA - IHS
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
JLL - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
TDS - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
LILAK - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
RMAX - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More

NYC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NYC and AIRE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NYC and AIRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NYC
1D Price
Change %
NYC100%
-14.08%
AIRE - NYC
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.25%
FTHM - NYC
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.27%
CBRE - NYC
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
CWK - NYC
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
IHS - NYC
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More