Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHGIX vs RMFCX
IHGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts IHGIX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth A
Price$36.82
Change+$0.20 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.09B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
IHGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHGIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. IHGIX (18.1B). IHGIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: IHGIX (1.31) vs RMFCX (1.20). IHGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: IHGIX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). IHGIX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. IHGIX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IHGIX: RMFCX (250) vs IHGIX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. IHGIX (-1.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. IHGIX (52.02).
| IHGIX | RMFCX | IHGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.697 | 13.689 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 111B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.20 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | 4.96 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.47 | 38.79 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.02 | 57.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.62 | 91.18 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers