Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHGIX vs RMFCX
IHGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts IHGIX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth A
Price$34.07
Change-$0.40 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.42B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
IHGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHGIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. IHGIX (17.4B). IHGIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: IHGIX (1.41) vs RMFCX (1.31). IHGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: IHGIX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). IHGIX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. IHGIX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IHGIX: RMFCX (250) vs IHGIX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. IHGIX (-2.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. IHGIX (53.20).
| IHGIX | RMFCX | IHGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.808 | 6.021 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 106B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.31 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.00 | 8.70 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.98 | 28.43 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.20 | 59.85 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.78 | 69.75 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement