IHCPF
Price
$9.13
Change
-$1.10 (-10.75%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.26B
ZHSHF
Price
$1.35
Change
-$1.21 (-47.27%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IHCPF vs ZHSHF

Header iconIHCPF vs ZHSHF Comparison
Open Charts IHCPF vs ZHSHFBanner chart's image
Inchcape
Price$9.13
Change-$1.10 (-10.75%)
Volume$2.56K
Capitalization3.26B
Zhongsheng Group Holdings
Price$1.35
Change-$1.21 (-47.27%)
Volume$14.5K
Capitalization5.25B
IHCPF vs ZHSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IHCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZHSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IHCPF vs. ZHSHF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHCPF is a Hold and ZHSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (IHCPF: $9.13 vs. ZHSHF: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: IHCPF and ZHSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IHCPF: 330% vs. ZHSHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IHCPF: $3.26B vs. ZHSHF: $5.25B
IHCPF [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $3.26B. ZHSHF’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $5.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IHCPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZHSHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IHCPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZHSHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZHSHF is a better buy in the long-term than IHCPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IHCPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZHSHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IHCPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZHSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZHSHF is a better buy in the short-term than IHCPF.

Price Growth

IHCPF (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZHSHF (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.47% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZHSHF($5.25B) has a higher market cap than IHCPF($3.27B). IHCPF has higher P/E ratio than ZHSHF: IHCPF (9.64) vs ZHSHF (8.63). IHCPF YTD gains are higher at: -3.055 vs. ZHSHF (-47.162).
IHCPFZHSHFIHCPF / ZHSHF
Capitalization3.27B5.25B62%
EBITDA717MN/A-
Gain YTD-3.055-47.1626%
P/E Ratio9.648.63112%
Revenue8.86BN/A-
Total Cash569MN/A-
Total Debt1.23BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IHCPF: Fundamental Ratings
IHCPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IHCPFZHSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IHCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZHSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTRB25.20-0.01
-0.03%
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF
URNM51.40-0.03
-0.06%
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
SAY25.48-0.02
-0.08%
Saratoga Investment Corp
JHDV38.31-0.47
-1.22%
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
PBD13.88-0.39
-2.73%
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF

IHCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHCPF has been loosely correlated with ZHSHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IHCPF jumps, then ZHSHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHCPF
1D Price
Change %
IHCPF100%
N/A
ZHSHF - IHCPF
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNED - IHCPF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
NAAS - IHCPF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
CASY - IHCPF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
KGFHY - IHCPF
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
More

ZHSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZHSHF has been loosely correlated with IHCPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZHSHF jumps, then IHCPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZHSHF
1D Price
Change %
ZHSHF100%
N/A
IHCPF - ZHSHF
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JBHIF - ZHSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLAB - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GHST - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSILF - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More