Advertisement
IGPFF vs KLKBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGPFF is a Buy and KLKBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IGPFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKLKBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IGPFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KLKBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KLKBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- KLKBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
IGPFF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KLKBY (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +5.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.49%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+2.88% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.27% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
| IGPFF | KLKBY | IGPFF / KLKBY | |
| Capitalization | 437K | 5.15B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 158K | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 25.824 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 2.78 | 38.83 | 7% |
| Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 120K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
IGPFF | KLKBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KLKBY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IGPFF (68). This means that KLKBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IGPFF’s over the last 12 months.
KLKBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as IGPFF (100). This means that KLKBY’s stock grew similarly to IGPFF’s over the last 12 months.
IGPFF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KLKBY (97). This means that IGPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than KLKBY’s over the last 12 months.
KLKBY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as IGPFF (71). This means that KLKBY’s stock grew similarly to IGPFF’s over the last 12 months.
IGPFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLKBY (47). This means that IGPFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLKBY’s over the last 12 months.
| IGPFF | KLKBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 20% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 21% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 25% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 12% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 12% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
IGPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IGPFF and RSSFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGPFF and RSSFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IGPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGPFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RSSFF - IGPFF | 10% Poorly correlated | -9.53% | ||
| MNHVF - IGPFF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ORENF - IGPFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KLKBY - IGPFF | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| SALRF - IGPFF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
KLKBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KLKBY and SALRF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLKBY and SALRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLKBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLKBY | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| SALRF - KLKBY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNHVF - KLKBY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ORENF - KLKBY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SARDY - KLKBY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IGPFF - KLKBY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||