IGGHY
Price
$14.15
Change
-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
6.32B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWP
Price
$21.20
Change
+$1.49 (+7.56%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.41B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IGGHY vs PWP

Header iconIGGHY vs PWP Comparison
Open Charts IGGHY vs PWPBanner chart's image
IG Group Holdings
Price$14.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Volume$511
Capitalization6.32B
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$21.20
Change+$1.49 (+7.56%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization1.41B
IGGHY vs PWP Comparison Chart in %
IGGHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IGGHY vs. PWP commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGGHY is a StrongBuy and PWP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (IGGHY: $20.00 vs. PWP: $21.20)
Brand notoriety: IGGHY and PWP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IGGHY: 84% vs. PWP: 125%
Market capitalization -- IGGHY: $6.32B vs. PWP: $1.41B
IGGHY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $6.32B. PWP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IGGHY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePWP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IGGHY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • PWP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGGHY is a better buy in the long-term than PWP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IGGHY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IGGHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PWP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IGGHY is a better buy in the short-term than PWP.

Price Growth

IGGHY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +9.97% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -6.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWP is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-6.92% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IGGHY($6.32B) has a higher market cap than PWP($1.41B). PWP has higher P/E ratio than IGGHY: PWP (27.89) vs IGGHY (13.92). IGGHY YTD gains are higher at: 38.696 vs. PWP (22.543). IGGHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 601M vs. PWP (71M). IGGHY has higher revenues than PWP: IGGHY (949M) vs PWP (757M).
IGGHYPWPIGGHY / PWP
Capitalization6.32B1.41B447%
EBITDA601M71M846%
Gain YTD38.69622.543172%
P/E Ratio13.9227.8950%
Revenue949M757M125%
Total CashN/A186M-
Total DebtN/A185M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IGGHY: Fundamental Ratings
IGGHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IGGHYPWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IGGHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AREWX26.010.08
+0.31%
American Century Real Estate R
FCVCX16.27N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value C
EISGX16.32-0.04
-0.24%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap I
VIMSX81.03-0.21
-0.26%
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
JGLTX23.75-0.58
-2.38%
Janus Henderson VIT Glb Tech&Innvt Instl

IGGHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IGGHY and MCO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGGHY and MCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGGHY
1D Price
Change %
IGGHY100%
N/A
MCO - IGGHY
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.90%
PWP - IGGHY
17%
Poorly correlated
-4.12%
LNSTY - IGGHY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIPR - IGGHY
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
SPXCY - IGGHY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
More

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
-4.12%
MC - PWP
85%
Closely correlated
-3.17%
PIPR - PWP
80%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
EVR - PWP
79%
Closely correlated
-4.50%
JEF - PWP
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
SF - PWP
78%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
More