IGGHY
Price
$14.15
Change
-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
6.32B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PIPR
Price
$341.35
Change
+$6.08 (+1.81%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.58B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IGGHY vs PIPR

Header iconIGGHY vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts IGGHY vs PIPRBanner chart's image
IG Group Holdings
Price$14.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Volume$511
Capitalization6.32B
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$341.35
Change+$6.08 (+1.81%)
Volume$40
Capitalization5.58B
IGGHY vs PIPR Comparison Chart in %
IGGHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PIPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IGGHY vs. PIPR commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGGHY is a StrongBuy and PIPR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (IGGHY: $20.00 vs. PIPR: $335.27)
Brand notoriety: IGGHY and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IGGHY: 84% vs. PIPR: 145%
Market capitalization -- IGGHY: $6.32B vs. PIPR: $5.58B
IGGHY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $6.32B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IGGHY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IGGHY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGGHY is a better buy in the long-term than PIPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IGGHY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IGGHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than IGGHY.

Price Growth

IGGHY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +9.97% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -6.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-6.92% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IGGHY($6.32B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($5.58B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than IGGHY: PIPR (25.19) vs IGGHY (13.92). IGGHY YTD gains are higher at: 38.696 vs. PIPR (-1.307). PIPR has higher revenues than IGGHY: PIPR (1.66B) vs IGGHY (949M).
IGGHYPIPRIGGHY / PIPR
Capitalization6.32B5.58B113%
EBITDA601MN/A-
Gain YTD38.696-1.307-2,961%
P/E Ratio13.9225.1955%
Revenue949M1.66B57%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A115M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IGGHY vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
IGGHY
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9172
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1627
SMR RATING
1..100
2440
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2472
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IGGHY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (27). This means that IGGHY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

IGGHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (27). This means that IGGHY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

IGGHY's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (40). This means that IGGHY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

IGGHY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (54). This means that IGGHY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

IGGHY's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (72). This means that IGGHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IGGHYPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IGGHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PIPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AREWX26.010.08
+0.31%
American Century Real Estate R
FCVCX16.27N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value C
EISGX16.32-0.04
-0.24%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap I
VIMSX81.03-0.21
-0.26%
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
JGLTX23.75-0.58
-2.38%
Janus Henderson VIT Glb Tech&Innvt Instl

IGGHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IGGHY and MCO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGGHY and MCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGGHY
1D Price
Change %
IGGHY100%
N/A
MCO - IGGHY
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.90%
PWP - IGGHY
17%
Poorly correlated
-4.12%
LNSTY - IGGHY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIPR - IGGHY
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
SPXCY - IGGHY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
-3.13%
EVR - PIPR
88%
Closely correlated
-4.50%
SF - PIPR
82%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
GS - PIPR
81%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
MS - PIPR
80%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
PJT - PIPR
80%
Closely correlated
-7.69%
More