IGF | OBOR | IGF / OBOR | |
Gain YTD | 17.304 | 15.878 | 109% |
Net Assets | 7.84B | 3.68M | 213,023% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.79 | 53% |
Turnover | 14.00 | 19.00 | 74% |
Yield | 3.10 | 3.39 | 92% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
IGF | OBOR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 4 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago80% | 12 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGF has been loosely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IGF jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that OBOR and ZIM have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBOR and ZIM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OBOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OBOR | 100% | +0.28% | ||
ZIM - OBOR | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
AC - OBOR | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
ICL - OBOR | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
ESLT - OBOR | -0% Poorly correlated | -4.46% |