IFSUF
Price
$12.44
Change
-$0.46 (-3.57%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
12.05B
KWHAF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.05 (+26.32%)
Updated
Mar 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFSUF vs KWHAF

Header iconIFSUF vs KWHAF Comparison
Open Charts IFSUF vs KWHAFBanner chart's image
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SPA Azioni
Price$12.44
Change-$0.46 (-3.57%)
Volume$545
Capitalization12.05B
K. Wah International Holdings
Price$0.24
Change+$0.05 (+26.32%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.02B
IFSUF vs KWHAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFSUF vs. KWHAF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFSUF is a Hold and KWHAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IFSUF: $12.44 vs. KWHAF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: IFSUF and KWHAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFSUF: 35% vs. KWHAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IFSUF: $12.05B vs. KWHAF: $1.02B
IFSUF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $12.05B. KWHAF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFSUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKWHAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IFSUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KWHAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFSUF is a better buy in the long-term than KWHAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFSUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IFSUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

IFSUF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while KWHAF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFSUF($12.1B) has a higher market cap than KWHAF($1.03B). IFSUF has higher P/E ratio than KWHAF: IFSUF (35.97) vs KWHAF (4.98). IFSUF YTD gains are higher at: 29.854 vs. KWHAF (10.253). KWHAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.14B vs. IFSUF (799M). KWHAF has more cash in the bank: 7.02B vs. IFSUF (52.2M). IFSUF has less debt than KWHAF: IFSUF (4.11B) vs KWHAF (14.9B). KWHAF has higher revenues than IFSUF: KWHAF (19.1B) vs IFSUF (880M).
IFSUFKWHAFIFSUF / KWHAF
Capitalization12.1B1.03B1,180%
EBITDA799M5.14B16%
Gain YTD29.85410.253291%
P/E Ratio35.974.98722%
Revenue880M19.1B5%
Total Cash52.2M7.02B1%
Total Debt4.11B14.9B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFSUF vs KWHAF: Fundamental Ratings
IFSUF
KWHAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66100
SMR RATING
1..100
7675
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KWHAF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as IFSUF (28). This means that KWHAF’s stock grew similarly to IFSUF’s over the last 12 months.

IFSUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KWHAF (100). This means that IFSUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KWHAF’s over the last 12 months.

KWHAF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as IFSUF (76). This means that KWHAF’s stock grew similarly to IFSUF’s over the last 12 months.

IFSUF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as KWHAF (55). This means that IFSUF’s stock grew similarly to KWHAF’s over the last 12 months.

KWHAF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFSUF (51). This means that KWHAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFSUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFSUFKWHAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VAFNX33.290.40
+1.22%
Invesco American Franchise R5
GFVUX16.020.15
+0.95%
Goldman Sachs Focused Value R6
PVMIX16.130.09
+0.56%
Principal MidCap Value I Inst
PEQKX25.690.11
+0.43%
Victory Pioneer Equity Income R6
RMYYX9.82N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income Y

IFSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFSUF and TTUUF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFSUF and TTUUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFSUF
1D Price
Change %
IFSUF100%
N/A
TTUUF - IFSUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAIAF - IFSUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMLLF - IFSUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KWHAF - IFSUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KANP - IFSUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KWHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KWHAF and CDEVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWHAF and CDEVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWHAF
1D Price
Change %
KWHAF100%
N/A
CDEVF - KWHAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRHC - KWHAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+87.27%
IWGFF - KWHAF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFSUF - KWHAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGFRY - KWHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More