IFSPF
Price
$9.60
Change
+$0.49 (+5.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
494.23M
STLJF
Price
$57.54
Change
+$1.46 (+2.60%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFSPF vs STLJF

Header iconIFSPF vs STLJF Comparison
Open Charts IFSPF vs STLJFBanner chart's image
Interfor
Price$9.60
Change+$0.49 (+5.38%)
Volume$52.36K
Capitalization494.23M
Stella Jones
Price$57.54
Change+$1.46 (+2.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.21B
IFSPF vs STLJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFSPF vs. STLJF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFSPF is a StrongBuy and STLJF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IFSPF: $9.60 vs. STLJF: $57.54)
Brand notoriety: IFSPF and STLJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFSPF: 170% vs. STLJF: 10%
Market capitalization -- IFSPF: $494.23M vs. STLJF: $3.21B
IFSPF [@Forest Products] is valued at $494.23M. STLJF’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $8.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFSPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IFSPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLJF is a better buy in the long-term than IFSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFSPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLJF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFSPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • STLJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFSPF is a better buy in the short-term than STLJF.

Price Growth

IFSPF (@Forest Products) experienced а +4.00% price change this week, while STLJF (@Forest Products) price change was +2.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (+0.67% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STLJF($3.21B) has a higher market cap than IFSPF($494M). STLJF YTD gains are higher at: 16.375 vs. IFSPF (-17.746). STLJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 645M vs. IFSPF (62.7M). STLJF has more cash in the bank: 65M vs. IFSPF (16.3M). IFSPF has less debt than STLJF: IFSPF (856M) vs STLJF (1.62B). STLJF has higher revenues than IFSPF: STLJF (3.45B) vs IFSPF (2.96B).
IFSPFSTLJFIFSPF / STLJF
Capitalization494M3.21B15%
EBITDA62.7M645M10%
Gain YTD-17.74616.375-108%
P/E RatioN/A13.36-
Revenue2.96B3.45B86%
Total Cash16.3M65M25%
Total Debt856M1.62B53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFSPF vs STLJF: Fundamental Ratings
IFSPF
STLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8125
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10042
SMR RATING
1..100
9550
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
565
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLJF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFSPF (50). This means that STLJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.

STLJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFSPF (100). This means that STLJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.

STLJF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFSPF (95). This means that STLJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.

STLJF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as IFSPF (63). This means that STLJF’s stock grew similarly to IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.

IFSPF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STLJF (65). This means that IFSPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STLJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFSPFSTLJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCMVX21.090.08
+0.38%
Monongahela All Cap Value
OCSGX7.230.02
+0.28%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth C
JVAPX39.12N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Value Advantage R3
AMINX69.48N/A
N/A
Amana Income Institutional
MSCFX30.75N/A
N/A
Mairs & Power Small Cap

IFSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFSPF has been loosely correlated with CFPZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFSPF jumps, then CFPZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFSPF
1D Price
Change %
IFSPF100%
+5.36%
CFPZF - IFSPF
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
ACAZF - IFSPF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
UFPI - IFSPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
WFG - IFSPF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
SSD - IFSPF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
More

STLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STLJF and NWGL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STLJF and NWGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLJF
1D Price
Change %
STLJF100%
+2.60%
NWGL - STLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
HMTC - STLJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFSPF - STLJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+5.36%
TCOR - STLJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCABY - STLJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More