IFS
Price
$31.51
Change
+$0.32 (+1.03%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
19 days until earnings call
NEWT
Price
$10.23
Change
+$0.17 (+1.69%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
271.48M
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IFS vs NEWT

Header iconIFS vs NEWT Comparison
Open Charts IFS vs NEWTBanner chart's image
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$31.51
Change+$0.32 (+1.03%)
Volume$74.58K
Capitalization2.77B
NewtekOne
Price$10.23
Change+$0.17 (+1.69%)
Volume$169.89K
Capitalization271.48M
IFS vs NEWT Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEWT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFS vs. NEWT commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFS is a StrongBuy and NEWT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (IFS: $31.51 vs. NEWT: $10.23)
Brand notoriety: IFS and NEWT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFS: 38% vs. NEWT: 67%
Market capitalization -- IFS: $2.77B vs. NEWT: $271.48M
IFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.77B. NEWT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $271.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNEWT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NEWT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than NEWT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEWT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NEWT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IFS and NEWT are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.99% price change this week, while NEWT (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

NEWT is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFS($2.77B) has a higher market cap than NEWT($271M). NEWT has higher P/E ratio than IFS: NEWT (11.32) vs IFS (9.76). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 7.396 vs. NEWT (-18.385). NEWT has less debt than IFS: NEWT (656M) vs IFS (10.4B). IFS has higher revenues than NEWT: IFS (6.82B) vs NEWT (160M).
IFSNEWTIFS / NEWT
Capitalization2.77B271M1,024%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.396-18.385-40%
P/E Ratio9.7611.3286%
Revenue6.82B160M4,264%
Total CashN/A15.6M-
Total Debt10.4B656M1,585%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFS vs NEWT: Fundamental Ratings
IFS
NEWT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7610
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4177
SMR RATING
1..100
736
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4479
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3357
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEWT's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFS (58). This means that NEWT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEWT (77). This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEWT’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as NEWT (36). This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to NEWT’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEWT (79). This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEWT’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NEWT (57). This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to NEWT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFSNEWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEWT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X84895.750000861.882800
+1.03%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
+1.03%
BAP - IFS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
BSAC - IFS
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
BCH - IFS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
TCBX - IFS
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
NEWT - IFS
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
More

NEWT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEWT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEWT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEWT
1D Price
Change %
NEWT100%
+1.69%
ASB - NEWT
68%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
BHLB - NEWT
68%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
ZION - NEWT
68%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
PNC - NEWT
68%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
WTFC - NEWT
67%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
More