IFJPY
Price
$25.02
Change
-$0.39 (-1.53%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
15.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLMDF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
753.68K
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFJPY vs XLMDF

Header iconIFJPY vs XLMDF Comparison
Open Charts IFJPY vs XLMDFBanner chart's image
Informa
Price$25.02
Change-$0.39 (-1.53%)
Volume$11.73K
Capitalization15.99B
XLMEDIA
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$420
Capitalization753.68K
IFJPY vs XLMDF Comparison Chart in %
IFJPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLMDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFJPY vs. XLMDF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFJPY is a StrongBuy and XLMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (IFJPY: $25.02 vs. XLMDF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: IFJPY and XLMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Publishing: Newspapers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFJPY: 47% vs. XLMDF: 11%
Market capitalization -- IFJPY: $15.99B vs. XLMDF: $753.68K
IFJPY [@Publishing: Newspapers] is valued at $15.99B. XLMDF’s [@Publishing: Newspapers] market capitalization is $753.68K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry ranges from $15.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry is $3.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXLMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IFJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XLMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFJPY is a better buy in the long-term than XLMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFJPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XLMDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFJPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XLMDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XLMDF is a better buy in the short-term than IFJPY.

Price Growth

IFJPY (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а -3.71% price change this week, while XLMDF (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Newspapers (+2.77% weekly)

The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFJPY($16B) has a higher market cap than XLMDF($754K). XLMDF has higher P/E ratio than IFJPY: XLMDF (267.97) vs IFJPY (173.31). IFJPY YTD gains are higher at: 29.195 vs. XLMDF (-81.818). IFJPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 468M vs. XLMDF (-38.31M). IFJPY has more cash in the bank: 765M vs. XLMDF (24.8M). XLMDF has less debt than IFJPY: XLMDF (1.17M) vs IFJPY (3.86B). IFJPY has higher revenues than XLMDF: IFJPY (3.89B) vs XLMDF (50.3M).
IFJPYXLMDFIFJPY / XLMDF
Capitalization16B754K2,122,016%
EBITDA468M-38.31M-1,222%
Gain YTD29.195-81.818-36%
P/E Ratio173.31267.9765%
Revenue3.89B50.3M7,742%
Total Cash765M24.8M3,085%
Total Debt3.86B1.17M329,241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFJPY vs XLMDF: Fundamental Ratings
IFJPY
XLMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4597
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFJPY's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as XLMDF (90). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for XLMDF (100). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as XLMDF (97). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XLMDF (97). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.

XLMDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as IFJPY (3). This means that XLMDF’s stock grew similarly to IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFJPYXLMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFJPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLMDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHEQ31.270.17
+0.55%
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
QYLD17.50N/A
N/A
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
CAAA20.59-0.01
-0.06%
First Trust AAA CMBS ETF
MGMT43.31-0.04
-0.08%
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
TSYY6.90-0.10
-1.43%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF

IFJPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFJPY
1D Price
Change %
IFJPY100%
-5.02%
SCHL - IFJPY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
PSO - IFJPY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
WLY - IFJPY
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
SBSNY - IFJPY
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
NYT - IFJPY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More

XLMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XLMDF and GWOX have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XLMDF and GWOX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLMDF
1D Price
Change %
XLMDF100%
N/A
GWOX - XLMDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RZSMF - XLMDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFJPY - XLMDF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.02%
STRYF - XLMDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBSNY - XLMDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More