IFJPY
Price
$25.02
Change
-$0.39 (-1.53%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
15.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WLYB
Price
$37.26
Change
-$0.04 (-0.11%)
Updated
Nov 13, 03:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.97B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFJPY vs WLYB

Header iconIFJPY vs WLYB Comparison
Open Charts IFJPY vs WLYBBanner chart's image
Informa
Price$25.02
Change-$0.39 (-1.53%)
Volume$11.73K
Capitalization15.99B
John Wiley & Sons
Price$37.26
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization1.97B
IFJPY vs WLYB Comparison Chart in %
IFJPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WLYB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFJPY vs. WLYB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFJPY is a Hold and WLYB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (IFJPY: $25.41 vs. WLYB: $36.95)
Brand notoriety: IFJPY and WLYB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Publishing: Newspapers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFJPY: 59% vs. WLYB: 100%
Market capitalization -- IFJPY: $15.99B vs. WLYB: $1.97B
IFJPY [@Publishing: Newspapers] is valued at $15.99B. WLYB’s [@Publishing: Newspapers] market capitalization is $1.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry ranges from $15.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry is $3.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWLYB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WLYB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFJPY is a better buy in the long-term than WLYB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFJPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLYB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFJPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WLYB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLYB is a better buy in the short-term than IFJPY.

Price Growth

IFJPY (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а -4.37% price change this week, while WLYB (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

WLYB is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Newspapers (+0.72% weekly)

The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFJPY($16B) has a higher market cap than WLYB($1.97B). IFJPY has higher P/E ratio than WLYB: IFJPY (173.31) vs WLYB (20.76). IFJPY YTD gains are higher at: 29.195 vs. WLYB (-13.983). IFJPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 468M vs. WLYB (336M). IFJPY has more cash in the bank: 765M vs. WLYB (81.8M). WLYB has less debt than IFJPY: WLYB (924M) vs IFJPY (3.86B). IFJPY has higher revenues than WLYB: IFJPY (3.89B) vs WLYB (1.67B).
IFJPYWLYBIFJPY / WLYB
Capitalization16B1.97B811%
EBITDA468M336M139%
Gain YTD29.195-13.983-209%
P/E Ratio173.3120.76835%
Revenue3.89B1.67B233%
Total Cash765M81.8M935%
Total Debt3.86B924M418%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFJPY vs WLYB: Fundamental Ratings
IFJPY
WLYB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1084
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1475
SMR RATING
1..100
9458
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFJPY's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as WLYB (93) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to WLYB’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLYB (75) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLYB’s over the last 12 months.

WLYB's SMR Rating (58) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFJPY (94) in the null industry. This means that WLYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as WLYB (63) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to WLYB’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLYB (96) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than WLYB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFJPYWLYB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFJPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WLYB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHEQ31.270.17
+0.55%
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
QYLD17.50N/A
N/A
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
CAAA20.59-0.01
-0.06%
First Trust AAA CMBS ETF
MGMT43.31-0.04
-0.08%
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
TSYY6.90-0.10
-1.43%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF

IFJPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFJPY
1D Price
Change %
IFJPY100%
-5.02%
SCHL - IFJPY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
PSO - IFJPY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
WLY - IFJPY
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
SBSNY - IFJPY
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
NYT - IFJPY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More

WLYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLYB and GCI have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLYB and GCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLYB
1D Price
Change %
WLYB100%
N/A
GCI - WLYB
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
NYT - WLYB
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
PSO - WLYB
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
IFJPY - WLYB
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.02%
EDUC - WLYB
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More