IFJPY
Price
$24.11
Change
+$0.10 (+0.42%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSORF
Price
$13.23
Change
-$0.44 (-3.22%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
Capitalization
9.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFJPY vs PSORF

Header iconIFJPY vs PSORF Comparison
Open Charts IFJPY vs PSORFBanner chart's image
Informa
Price$24.11
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
Volume$16.88K
Capitalization15.2B
Pearson
Price$13.23
Change-$0.44 (-3.22%)
Volume$422
Capitalization9.01B
IFJPY vs PSORF Comparison Chart in %
IFJPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSORF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFJPY vs. PSORF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFJPY is a StrongBuy and PSORF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IFJPY: $24.10 vs. PSORF: $13.23)
Brand notoriety: IFJPY and PSORF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Publishing: Newspapers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFJPY: 56% vs. PSORF: 99%
Market capitalization -- IFJPY: $15.2B vs. PSORF: $9.01B
IFJPY [@Publishing: Newspapers] is valued at $15.2B. PSORF’s [@Publishing: Newspapers] market capitalization is $9.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry ranges from $15.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry is $3.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSORF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSORF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFJPY is a better buy in the long-term than PSORF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFJPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSORF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFJPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PSORF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFJPY is a better buy in the short-term than PSORF.

Price Growth

IFJPY (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а +2.18% price change this week, while PSORF (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Newspapers (-0.56% weekly)

The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFJPY($15.2B) has a higher market cap than PSORF($9.01B). IFJPY has higher P/E ratio than PSORF: IFJPY (162.18) vs PSORF (15.01). IFJPY YTD gains are higher at: 22.559 vs. PSORF (-18.188). PSORF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.1B vs. IFJPY (468M). IFJPY has more cash in the bank: 765M vs. PSORF (347M). PSORF has less debt than IFJPY: PSORF (1.49B) vs IFJPY (3.86B). IFJPY has higher revenues than PSORF: IFJPY (3.89B) vs PSORF (3.52B).
IFJPYPSORFIFJPY / PSORF
Capitalization15.2B9.01B169%
EBITDA468M1.1B42%
Gain YTD22.559-18.188-124%
P/E Ratio162.1815.011,080%
Revenue3.89B3.52B111%
Total Cash765M347M220%
Total Debt3.86B1.49B260%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFJPY vs PSORF: Fundamental Ratings
IFJPY
PSORF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2637
SMR RATING
1..100
9574
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5374
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
389
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSORF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFJPY (76). This means that PSORF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as PSORF (37). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSORF’s over the last 12 months.

PSORF's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as IFJPY (95). This means that PSORF’s stock grew similarly to IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as PSORF (74). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSORF’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSORF (89). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than PSORF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFJPYPSORF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFJPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSORF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQS34.630.35
+1.02%
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
ACES34.010.21
+0.61%
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
HVAC31.930.11
+0.35%
Advisorshares HVAC And Industrials ETF
FDHY49.510.10
+0.20%
Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF
SILJ29.33-0.36
-1.21%
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF

IFJPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFJPY
1D Price
Change %
IFJPY100%
+0.44%
SCHL - IFJPY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
PSO - IFJPY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
WLY - IFJPY
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
SBSNY - IFJPY
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
NYT - IFJPY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More

PSORF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSORF and IFJPY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSORF and IFJPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSORF
1D Price
Change %
PSORF100%
N/A
IFJPY - PSORF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
SBSNY - PSORF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
PSO - PSORF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
YLWDF - PSORF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RZSMF - PSORF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More