It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PSO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
IFJPY (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -4.51% price change this week, while PSO (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -4.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.22%.
PSO is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2023.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
IFJPY | PSO | IFJPY / PSO | |
Capitalization | 13.6B | 8.98B | 151% |
EBITDA | 884M | 1.1B | 81% |
Gain YTD | 4.168 | 32.577 | 13% |
P/E Ratio | 30.30 | 19.57 | 155% |
Revenue | 2.79B | 3.67B | 76% |
Total Cash | 1.06B | 312M | 339% |
Total Debt | 2.16B | 1.16B | 186% |
IFJPY | PSO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IFJPY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as PSO (28) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSO’s over the last 12 months.
PSO's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is significantly better than the same rating for IFJPY (96) in the null industry. This means that PSO’s stock grew significantly faster than IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as PSO (81) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSO’s over the last 12 months.
PSO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is in the same range as IFJPY (58) in the null industry. This means that PSO’s stock grew similarly to IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
PSO's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is in the same range as IFJPY (47) in the null industry. This means that PSO’s stock grew similarly to IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
PSO | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IFJPY | 100% | -0.72% | ||
SCHL - IFJPY | 22% Poorly correlated | -20.25% | ||
PSO - IFJPY | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
PSORF - IFJPY | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.87% | ||
SBSNY - IFJPY | 11% Poorly correlated | -4.22% | ||
XLMDF - IFJPY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PSO and WLY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSO and WLY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSO | 100% | +0.70% | ||
WLY - PSO | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
IFJPY - PSO | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
SCHL - PSO | 13% Poorly correlated | -20.25% | ||
NYT - PSO | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
GCI - PSO | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.67% | ||
More |