IFJPY
Price
$24.71
Change
+$0.16 (+0.65%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
15.49B
PSO
Price
$13.99
Change
+$0.07 (+0.50%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFJPY vs PSO

Header iconIFJPY vs PSO Comparison
Open Charts IFJPY vs PSOBanner chart's image
Informa
Price$24.71
Change+$0.16 (+0.65%)
Volume$11.77K
Capitalization15.49B
Pearson
Price$13.99
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
Volume$283.04K
Capitalization8.93B
IFJPY vs PSO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFJPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFJPY vs. PSO commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFJPY is a Hold and PSO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (IFJPY: $24.71 vs. PSO: $13.99)
Brand notoriety: IFJPY and PSO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Publishing: Newspapers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFJPY: 99% vs. PSO: 47%
Market capitalization -- IFJPY: $15.49B vs. PSO: $8.93B
IFJPY [@Publishing: Newspapers] is valued at $15.49B. PSO’s [@Publishing: Newspapers] market capitalization is $8.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry ranges from $15.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry is $3.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IFJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFJPY is a better buy in the long-term than PSO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFJPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFJPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PSO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFJPY is a better buy in the short-term than PSO.

Price Growth

IFJPY (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а -2.68% price change this week, while PSO (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Newspapers (+0.56% weekly)

The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFJPY($15.5B) has a higher market cap than PSO($8.93B). IFJPY has higher P/E ratio than PSO: IFJPY (166.99) vs PSO (15.95). IFJPY YTD gains are higher at: 25.635 vs. PSO (-11.515). PSO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.1B vs. IFJPY (468M). IFJPY has more cash in the bank: 765M vs. PSO (347M). PSO has less debt than IFJPY: PSO (1.49B) vs IFJPY (3.86B). IFJPY has higher revenues than PSO: IFJPY (3.89B) vs PSO (3.52B).
IFJPYPSOIFJPY / PSO
Capitalization15.5B8.93B174%
EBITDA468M1.1B42%
Gain YTD25.635-11.515-223%
P/E Ratio166.9915.951,047%
Revenue3.89B3.52B111%
Total Cash765M347M220%
Total Debt3.86B1.49B260%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFJPY vs PSO: Fundamental Ratings
IFJPY
PSO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5089
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1525
SMR RATING
1..100
9574
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
376
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSO's Valuation (26) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFJPY (73) in the null industry. This means that PSO’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as PSO (25) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSO’s over the last 12 months.

PSO's SMR Rating (74) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is in the same range as IFJPY (95) in the null industry. This means that PSO’s stock grew similarly to IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PSO (62) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSO’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSO (76) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than PSO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFJPYPSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFJPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTR35.310.11
+0.30%
Global X NASDAQ 100® Tail Risk ETF
IBDX25.57N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF
HFSI35.69-0.02
-0.06%
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
GLL17.45-0.16
-0.91%
ProShares UltraShort Gold
IIF26.47-0.29
-1.08%
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund

IFJPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFJPY
1D Price
Change %
IFJPY100%
+0.66%
SCHL - IFJPY
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
PSO - IFJPY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
PSORF - IFJPY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBSNY - IFJPY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XLMDF - IFJPY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSO and GCI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSO and GCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSO
1D Price
Change %
PSO100%
+0.50%
GCI - PSO
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
IFJPY - PSO
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
TNMG - PSO
13%
Poorly correlated
+11.46%
NYT - PSO
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
SCHL - PSO
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
More