Advertisement
IFJPY vs PSO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFJPY is a Hold and PSO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IFJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PSO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IFJPY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IFJPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PSO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
IFJPY (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +4.05% price change this week, while PSO (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+1.33% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| IFJPY | PSO | IFJPY / PSO | |
| Capitalization | 13.6B | 8.98B | 151% |
| EBITDA | 884M | 1.1B | 81% |
| Gain YTD | 20.444 | -10.046 | -204% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.30 | 19.57 | 155% |
| Revenue | 2.79B | 3.67B | 76% |
| Total Cash | 1.06B | 312M | 339% |
| Total Debt | 2.16B | 1.16B | 186% |
IFJPY | PSO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PSO's Valuation (23) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFJPY (67) in the null industry. This means that PSO’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PSO (20) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSO’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as PSO (81) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSO’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as PSO (61) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSO’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSO (73) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than PSO’s over the last 12 months.
| IFJPY | PSO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
IFJPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFJPY | 100% | -1.87% | ||
| SCHL - IFJPY | 22% Poorly correlated | +23.90% | ||
| PSO - IFJPY | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| PSORF - IFJPY | 12% Poorly correlated | +4.85% | ||
| SBSNY - IFJPY | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.08% | ||
| XLMDF - IFJPY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PSO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PSO and NYT have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSO and NYT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSO | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| NYT - PSO | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| IFJPY - PSO | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| GCI - PSO | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| WLY - PSO | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
| SCHL - PSO | 12% Poorly correlated | +23.90% | ||
More | ||||