IFCZF
Price
$203.51
Change
+$6.57 (+3.34%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
36.03B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFCS
Price
$36.65
Change
-$0.38 (-1.03%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
945.56M
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFCZF vs UFCS

Header iconIFCZF vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts IFCZF vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Intact Financial
Price$203.51
Change+$6.57 (+3.34%)
Volume$26.13K
Capitalization36.03B
United Fire Group
Price$36.65
Change-$0.38 (-1.03%)
Volume$830
Capitalization945.56M
IFCZF vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
IFCZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFCZF vs. UFCS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a StrongBuy and UFCS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (IFCZF: $203.51 vs. UFCS: $37.03)
Brand notoriety: IFCZF and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFCZF: 348% vs. UFCS: 128%
Market capitalization -- IFCZF: $35.67B vs. UFCS: $935.1M
IFCZF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $35.67B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $935.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $130.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than IFCZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFCZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IFCZF and UFCS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +6.46% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +4.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.85% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($36B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($946M). IFCZF has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: IFCZF (17.10) vs UFCS (8.74). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 32.326 vs. IFCZF (11.708). IFCZF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. UFCS (1.19B). UFCS has less debt than IFCZF: UFCS (117M) vs IFCZF (5.43B). IFCZF has higher revenues than UFCS: IFCZF (24.7B) vs UFCS (1.32B).
IFCZFUFCSIFCZF / UFCS
Capitalization36B946M3,805%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.70832.32636%
P/E Ratio17.108.74196%
Revenue24.7B1.32B1,868%
Total Cash19.5B1.19B1,643%
Total Debt5.43B117M4,638%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2724
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2443
SMR RATING
1..100
9368
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7883
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (46) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (71) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as UFCS (43) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (68) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (93) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (58) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as UFCS (83) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFCZFUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFCZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKYE1.520.06
+4.11%
Skye Bioscience
MASI149.793.11
+2.12%
Masimo Corp
EPRX6.600.07
+1.07%
Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals
CASH69.480.46
+0.67%
Pathward Financial
ABLLL25.470.05
+0.20%
Abacus Global Management Inc. 9.875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
+3.34%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with CINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then CINF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
+1.09%
CINF - UFCS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
ORI - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
THG - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
SAFT - UFCS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
HMN - UFCS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More