IFCZF
Price
$189.85
Change
-$1.57 (-0.82%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
33.03B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLMR
Price
$121.99
Change
+$2.25 (+1.88%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.29B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFCZF vs PLMR

Header iconIFCZF vs PLMR Comparison
Open Charts IFCZF vs PLMRBanner chart's image
Intact Financial
Price$189.85
Change-$1.57 (-0.82%)
Volume$187
Capitalization33.03B
Palomar Holdings
Price$121.99
Change+$2.25 (+1.88%)
Volume$5.46K
Capitalization3.29B
IFCZF vs PLMR Comparison Chart in %
IFCZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFCZF vs. PLMR commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a Hold and PLMR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (IFCZF: $184.68 vs. PLMR: $124.22)
Brand notoriety: IFCZF and PLMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFCZF: 7% vs. PLMR: 114%
Market capitalization -- IFCZF: $33.03B vs. PLMR: $3.29B
IFCZF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $33.03B. PLMR’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $3.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $122.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLMR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the long-term than PLMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFCZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PLMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the short-term than PLMR.

Price Growth

IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.75% price change this week, while PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLMR is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.28% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($33B) has a higher market cap than PLMR($3.29B). PLMR has higher P/E ratio than IFCZF: PLMR (19.38) vs IFCZF (15.09). PLMR YTD gains are higher at: -7.821 vs. IFCZF (-11.154). IFCZF has more cash in the bank: 19.7B vs. PLMR (662M). PLMR has less debt than IFCZF: PLMR (0) vs IFCZF (5.46B). IFCZF has higher revenues than PLMR: IFCZF (25.6B) vs PLMR (776M).
IFCZFPLMRIFCZF / PLMR
Capitalization33B3.29B1,002%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.154-7.821143%
P/E Ratio15.0919.3878%
Revenue25.6B776M3,299%
Total Cash19.7B662M2,976%
Total Debt5.46B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF vs PLMR: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
PLMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3867
SMR RATING
1..100
9342
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8676
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFCZF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMR (91) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMR (67) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's SMR Rating (42) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFCZF (93) in the null industry. This means that PLMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (63) in the null industry. This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (86) in the null industry. This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFCZFPLMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFCZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RETL9.960.52
+5.51%
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X ETF
DHF2.560.01
+0.39%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
PSEP44.130.11
+0.25%
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF-Sep
SPLG80.00N/A
N/A
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
ORCX11.36-0.65
-5.41%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
+1.30%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
More

PLMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMR
1D Price
Change %
PLMR100%
+0.51%
SKWD - PLMR
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
BOW - PLMR
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
RLI - PLMR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
THG - PLMR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
ORI - PLMR
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
More