IFCZF
Price
$201.58
Change
-$0.22 (-0.11%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
36.2B
MSADF
Price
$25.16
Change
+$1.06 (+4.40%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
36.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFCZF vs MSADF

Header iconIFCZF vs MSADF Comparison
Open Charts IFCZF vs MSADFBanner chart's image
Intact Financial
Price$201.58
Change-$0.22 (-0.11%)
Volume$337
Capitalization36.2B
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings
Price$25.16
Change+$1.06 (+4.40%)
Volume$175
Capitalization36.6B
IFCZF vs MSADF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFCZF vs. MSADF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a Hold and MSADF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (IFCZF: $201.58 vs. MSADF: $25.16)
Brand notoriety: IFCZF and MSADF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFCZF: 2% vs. MSADF: 1%
Market capitalization -- IFCZF: $36.2B vs. MSADF: $36.6B
IFCZF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $36.2B. MSADF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $36.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSADF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSADF is a better buy in the long-term than IFCZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFCZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSADF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSADF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSADF is a better buy in the short-term than IFCZF.

Price Growth

IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.05% price change this week, while MSADF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +17.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.66% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSADF($36.6B) and IFCZF($36.2B) have the same market capitalization . IFCZF has higher P/E ratio than MSADF: IFCZF (21.28) vs MSADF (8.31). MSADF YTD gains are higher at: 18.904 vs. IFCZF (10.649). MSADF has more cash in the bank: 2.47T vs. IFCZF (19.5B). IFCZF has less debt than MSADF: IFCZF (5.43B) vs MSADF (591B). MSADF has higher revenues than IFCZF: MSADF (6.27T) vs IFCZF (24.7B).
IFCZFMSADFIFCZF / MSADF
Capitalization36.2B36.6B99%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.64918.90456%
P/E Ratio21.288.31256%
Revenue24.7B6.27T0%
Total Cash19.5B2.47T1%
Total Debt5.43B591B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF vs MSADF: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
MSADF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5035
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
714
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSADF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (63). This means that MSADF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MSADF (14). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to MSADF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as MSADF (100). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to MSADF’s over the last 12 months.

MSADF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (61). This means that MSADF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSADF (97). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSADF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFCZFMSADF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIRM67.933.10
+4.78%
Mirum Pharmaceuticals
FLGC24.300.80
+3.40%
Flora Growth Corp
VRM29.920.07
+0.23%
Vroom Inc
AEE100.56-0.87
-0.86%
Ameren Corp
NBBK18.05-0.39
-2.11%
NB Bancorp

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFCZF and IAUGF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFCZF and IAUGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
-0.11%
IAUGF - IFCZF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSADY - IFCZF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
PINXY - IFCZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHOLF - IFCZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSADF - IFCZF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+4.40%
More

MSADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSADF has been loosely correlated with MSADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSADF jumps, then MSADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSADF
1D Price
Change %
MSADF100%
+4.40%
MSADY - MSADF
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
SMPNY - MSADF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
TKOMY - MSADF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
TKOMF - MSADF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNFR - MSADF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
More