Advertisement
IFCZF vs MCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a Hold and MCY is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IFCZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IFCZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while MCY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
MCY is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.66% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| IFCZF | MCY | IFCZF / MCY | |
| Capitalization | 34.8B | 5.01B | 694% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.924 | 39.702 | 25% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.39 | 11.41 | 144% |
| Revenue | 24.7B | 5.77B | 428% |
| Total Cash | 19.5B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.43B | 590M | 920% |
IFCZF | MCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCY's Valuation (61) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (71) in the null industry. This means that MCY’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.
IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as MCY (25) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to MCY’s over the last 12 months.
MCY's SMR Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFCZF (93) in the null industry. This means that MCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.
MCY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (52) in the null industry. This means that MCY’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.
MCY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFCZF (76) in the null industry. This means that MCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.
| IFCZF | MCY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 38% | 7 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 37% | 7 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 49% | 7 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 45% | 7 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 43% | 7 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 50% | 9 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 34% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 26% | 7 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 52% | 7 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
IFCZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFCZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFCZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PLMR - IFCZF | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| UFCS - IFCZF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| FRFHF - IFCZF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MCY - IFCZF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
| BNT - IFCZF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||
MCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCY has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCY jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.