IFBD
Price
$1.47
Change
+$0.04 (+2.80%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.75M
TMNSF
Price
$75.63
Change
-$4.37 (-5.46%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.18B
Ad is loading...

IFBD vs TMNSF

Header iconIFBD vs TMNSF Comparison
Open Charts IFBD vs TMNSFBanner chart's image
Infobird
Price$1.47
Change+$0.04 (+2.80%)
Volume$4.35K
Capitalization5.75M
Temenos AG
Price$75.63
Change-$4.37 (-5.46%)
Volume$140
Capitalization6.18B
IFBD vs TMNSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (IFBD: $1.43 vs. TMNSF: $75.63)
Brand notoriety: IFBD and TMNSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFBD: 34% vs. TMNSF: 91%
Market capitalization -- IFBD: $5.75M vs. TMNSF: $6.18B
IFBD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.75M. TMNSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFBD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMNSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IFBD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMNSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMNSF is a better buy in the long-term than IFBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IFBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

IFBD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.34% price change this week, while TMNSF (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFBD is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.38% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMNSF($6.18B) has a higher market cap than IFBD($5.75M). TMNSF has higher P/E ratio than IFBD: TMNSF (50.00) vs IFBD (6.69). TMNSF YTD gains are higher at: 6.411 vs. IFBD (-36.726). TMNSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 311M vs. IFBD (-14.72M). TMNSF has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. IFBD (3.39K). IFBD has less debt than TMNSF: IFBD (3.62M) vs TMNSF (841M). TMNSF has higher revenues than IFBD: TMNSF (955M) vs IFBD (5.51M).
IFBDTMNSFIFBD / TMNSF
Capitalization5.75M6.18B0%
EBITDA-14.72M311M-5%
Gain YTD-36.7266.411-573%
P/E Ratio6.6950.0013%
Revenue5.51M955M1%
Total Cash3.39K112M0%
Total Debt3.62M841M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMNSF: Fundamental Ratings
TMNSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
37
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

IFBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and MRIN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and MRIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFBD
1D Price
Change %
IFBD100%
-3.38%
MRIN - IFBD
32%
Poorly correlated
-10.45%
FNCHF - IFBD
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - IFBD
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
BMR - IFBD
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
ASUR - IFBD
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.73%
More

TMNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMNSF has been loosely correlated with EB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMNSF jumps, then EB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMNSF
1D Price
Change %
TMNSF100%
-5.46%
EB - TMNSF
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
PAYO - TMNSF
35%
Loosely correlated
-10.86%
EVTC - TMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
IFBD - TMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
VASO - TMNSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
More