IFBD
Price
$2.04
Change
-$0.15 (-6.85%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
MKTDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

IFBD vs MKTDF

Header iconIFBD vs MKTDF Comparison
Open Charts IFBD vs MKTDFBanner chart's image
Infobird
Price$2.04
Change-$0.15 (-6.85%)
Volume$15.72K
CapitalizationN/A
Deepmarkit
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
CapitalizationN/A
IFBD vs MKTDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFBD vs. MKTDF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFBD is a Hold and MKTDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (IFBD: $2.04 vs. MKTDF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: IFBD and MKTDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFBD: 45% vs. MKTDF: 112%
Market capitalization -- IFBD: $5.75M vs. MKTDF: $643.32K
IFBD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.75M. MKTDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $643.32K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFBD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMKTDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MKTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFBD is a better buy in the long-term than MKTDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IFBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

IFBD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.77% price change this week, while MKTDF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFBD is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFBD($5.75M) has a higher market cap than MKTDF($643K). MKTDF YTD gains are higher at: -10.431 vs. IFBD (-80.534). MKTDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.48M vs. IFBD (-14.72M). MKTDF has more cash in the bank: 204K vs. IFBD (3.39K). MKTDF has less debt than IFBD: MKTDF (40K) vs IFBD (3.62M). IFBD has higher revenues than MKTDF: IFBD (5.51M) vs MKTDF (1.75K).
IFBDMKTDFIFBD / MKTDF
Capitalization5.75M643K894%
EBITDA-14.72M-8.48M174%
Gain YTD-80.534-10.431772%
P/E Ratio6.69N/A-
Revenue5.51M1.75K315,530%
Total Cash3.39K204K2%
Total Debt3.62M40K9,038%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MKTDF: Fundamental Ratings
MKTDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

IFBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and FNCHF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and FNCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFBD
1D Price
Change %
IFBD100%
-6.85%
FNCHF - IFBD
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - IFBD
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEGA - IFBD
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
TMSNY - IFBD
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.22%
KNAMF - IFBD
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MKTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKTDF and ONMD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKTDF and ONMD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKTDF
1D Price
Change %
MKTDF100%
N/A
ONMD - MKTDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.37%
GUNGF - MKTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOQPF - MKTDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CINT - MKTDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
IFBD - MKTDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.85%
More