IFBD
Price
$2.04
Change
+$0.06 (+3.03%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.75M
KNAMF
Price
$61.77
Change
-$2.08 (-3.26%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
7.67B
Ad is loading...

IFBD vs KNAMF

Header iconIFBD vs KNAMF Comparison
Open Charts IFBD vs KNAMFBanner chart's image
Infobird
Price$2.04
Change+$0.06 (+3.03%)
Volume$74.91K
Capitalization5.75M
KONAMI GROUP
Price$61.77
Change-$2.08 (-3.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.67B
IFBD vs KNAMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFBD vs. KNAMF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFBD is a Buy and KNAMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (IFBD: $1.95 vs. KNAMF: $61.77)
Brand notoriety: IFBD and KNAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFBD: 35% vs. KNAMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IFBD: $5.75M vs. KNAMF: $7.67B
IFBD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.75M. KNAMF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFBD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKNAMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IFBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KNAMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KNAMF is a better buy in the long-term than IFBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IFBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

IFBD (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.28% price change this week, while KNAMF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFBD is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.10% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KNAMF($7.67B) has a higher market cap than IFBD($5.75M). KNAMF has higher P/E ratio than IFBD: KNAMF (30.03) vs IFBD (6.69). KNAMF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. IFBD (-13.823). KNAMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 78B vs. IFBD (-14.72M). KNAMF has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. IFBD (3.39K). IFBD has less debt than KNAMF: IFBD (3.62M) vs KNAMF (59.8B). KNAMF has higher revenues than IFBD: KNAMF (311B) vs IFBD (5.51M).
IFBDKNAMFIFBD / KNAMF
Capitalization5.75M7.67B0%
EBITDA-14.72M78B-0%
Gain YTD-13.8230.000-
P/E Ratio6.6930.0322%
Revenue5.51M311B0%
Total Cash3.39K209B0%
Total Debt3.62M59.8B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KNAMF: Fundamental Ratings
KNAMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

IFBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and FNCHF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and FNCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFBD
1D Price
Change %
IFBD100%
+2.51%
FNCHF - IFBD
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - IFBD
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEGA - IFBD
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
TMSNY - IFBD
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
KNAMF - IFBD
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KNAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KNAMF has been closely correlated with DTSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KNAMF jumps, then DTSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KNAMF
1D Price
Change %
KNAMF100%
N/A
DTSS - KNAMF
78%
Closely correlated
+4.55%
PEGA - KNAMF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
ELWS - KNAMF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
NEXOY - KNAMF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
LYFT - KNAMF
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.32%
More