Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IFAAX vs RBBAX
IFAAX vs RBBAX Comparison
Open Charts IFAAX vs RBBAX
Meeder Conservative Allocation Adviser
Price$24.83
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.54M
Columbia Income Builder A
Price$12.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.6M
IFAAX vs RBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IFAAX vs. RBBAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFAAX is a Hold and RBBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBBAX has more cash in the bank: 850M vs. IFAAX (163M). RBBAX pays higher dividends than IFAAX: RBBAX (3.81) vs IFAAX (2.98). IFAAX was incepted earlier than RBBAX: IFAAX (9 years) vs RBBAX (20 years). IFAAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RBBAX (0.97). IFAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. RBBAX (18.00). RBBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IFAAX: RBBAX (2000) vs IFAAX (2500). RBBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. IFAAX (6.33). IFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.39 vs. RBBAX (13.43).
| IFAAX | RBBAX | IFAAX / RBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.97 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.97 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.862 | 10.508 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 850M | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 3.81 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 7.97 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.11 | 23.60 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.39 | 13.43 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement