IESC
Price
$386.20
Change
+$2.58 (+0.67%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.67B
46 days until earnings call
SHIM
Price
$2.40
Change
-$0.06 (-2.44%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
84.93M
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IESC vs SHIM

Header iconIESC vs SHIM Comparison
Open Charts IESC vs SHIMBanner chart's image
IES Holdings
Price$386.20
Change+$2.58 (+0.67%)
Volume$271.62K
Capitalization7.67B
Shimmick
Price$2.40
Change-$0.06 (-2.44%)
Volume$17.26K
Capitalization84.93M
IESC vs SHIM Comparison Chart in %
IESC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IESC vs. SHIM commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IESC is a Hold and SHIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (IESC: $386.20 vs. SHIM: $2.40)
Brand notoriety: IESC and SHIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IESC: 188% vs. SHIM: 51%
Market capitalization -- IESC: $7.67B vs. SHIM: $84.93M
IESC [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $7.67B. SHIM’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $84.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IESC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IESC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the long-term than SHIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IESC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHIM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IESC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SHIM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the short-term than SHIM.

Price Growth

IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +6.81% price change this week, while SHIM (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -8.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +234.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

IESC is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

SHIM is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.35% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IESC($7.67B) has a higher market cap than SHIM($84.9M). IESC YTD gains are higher at: 92.178 vs. SHIM (-7.143). IESC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 412M vs. SHIM (-40.14M). IESC has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. SHIM (21.4M). SHIM has less debt than IESC: SHIM (51.9M) vs IESC (72.7M). IESC has higher revenues than SHIM: IESC (3.25B) vs SHIM (520M).
IESCSHIMIESC / SHIM
Capitalization7.67B84.9M9,032%
EBITDA412M-40.14M-1,027%
Gain YTD92.178-7.143-1,290%
P/E Ratio29.53N/A-
Revenue3.25B520M625%
Total Cash168M21.4M785%
Total Debt72.7M51.9M140%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IESC: Fundamental Ratings
IESC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IESCSHIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IESC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLFFX21.750.18
+0.83%
Clifford Capital Partners Investor
BRWJX28.990.13
+0.45%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq I
RNPGX74.200.14
+0.19%
American Funds New Perspective R6
VAIGX23.530.01
+0.04%
Vanguard Advice Select Intl Gr Admiral
ASPZX39.52-0.16
-0.40%
Alger Spectra Z

IESC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESC
1D Price
Change %
IESC100%
+0.67%
FIX - IESC
77%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
EME - IESC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
STRL - IESC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
MTZ - IESC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
PWR - IESC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
More

SHIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHIM and CDLR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHIM and CDLR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHIM
1D Price
Change %
SHIM100%
-2.24%
CDLR - SHIM
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
IESC - SHIM
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
WLDN - SHIM
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
ACA - SHIM
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
FLR - SHIM
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.74%
More