It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IESC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileROAD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IESC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROAD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -15.10% price change this week, while ROAD (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.81%.
IESC is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
ROAD is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
IESC | ROAD | IESC / ROAD | |
Capitalization | 4.28B | 5.36B | 80% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 181.053 | 120.358 | 150% |
P/E Ratio | 21.65 | 73.21 | 30% |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
IESC | ROAD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IESC's Valuation (74) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ROAD (94). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to ROAD’s over the last 12 months.
ROAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (11). This means that ROAD’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (40) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ROAD (66). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to ROAD’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ROAD (37). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to ROAD’s over the last 12 months.
ROAD's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (28). This means that ROAD’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC | ROAD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 6 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IESC | 100% | -9.18% | ||
MTZ - IESC | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
ROAD - IESC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
STRL - IESC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
FIX - IESC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
EME - IESC | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROAD has been loosely correlated with STRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROAD jumps, then STRL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ROAD | 100% | +0.62% | ||
STRL - ROAD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
IESC - ROAD | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.84% | ||
APG - ROAD | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.25% | ||
MYRG - ROAD | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
MTZ - ROAD | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More |