IEHC
Price
$8.50
Change
-$0.60 (-6.59%)
Updated
Nov 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGBLY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
4.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEHC vs KGBLY

Header iconIEHC vs KGBLY Comparison
Open Charts IEHC vs KGBLYBanner chart's image
IEH
Price$8.50
Change-$0.60 (-6.59%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization20.67M
Kingboard Laminates Holdings
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$551
Capitalization4.96B
IEHC vs KGBLY Comparison Chart in %
IEHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IEHC vs. KGBLY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEHC is a Hold and KGBLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (IEHC: $8.50 vs. KGBLY: $40.10)
Brand notoriety: IEHC and KGBLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IEHC: 50% vs. KGBLY: 27%
Market capitalization -- IEHC: $20.67M vs. KGBLY: $4.96B
IEHC [@Electronic Components] is valued at $20.67M. KGBLY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $165.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $9.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IEHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGBLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IEHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KGBLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than IEHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IEHC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGBLY’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IEHC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KGBLY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGBLY is a better buy in the short-term than IEHC.

Price Growth

IEHC (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGBLY (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-3.60% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGBLY($4.96B) has a higher market cap than IEHC($20.7M). KGBLY has higher P/E ratio than IEHC: KGBLY (25.39) vs IEHC (23.78). KGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 189.493 vs. IEHC (-20.930). KGBLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.94B vs. IEHC (234K). KGBLY has higher revenues than IEHC: KGBLY (18.5B) vs IEHC (28M).
IEHCKGBLYIEHC / KGBLY
Capitalization20.7M4.96B0%
EBITDA234K2.94B0%
Gain YTD-20.930189.493-11%
P/E Ratio23.7825.3994%
Revenue28M18.5B0%
Total Cash10.3MN/A-
Total Debt2.14MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IEHC vs KGBLY: Fundamental Ratings
IEHC
KGBLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3049
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6524

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGBLY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEHC (51). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

KGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEHC (100). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

IEHC's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as KGBLY (94). This means that IEHC’s stock grew similarly to KGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

KGBLY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEHC (77). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

KGBLY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IEHC (100). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew significantly faster than IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEHCKGBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRRE8.77N/A
N/A
Blue Ridge Real Estate Co.
SFSHF8.45N/A
N/A
Safestore Holdings PLC
SHKLY141.82N/A
N/A
Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd.
KGGNF2.49N/A
N/A
Kogan Com Ltd.
CNTHN41.80N/A
N/A
Connecticut Light & Power Co. (The)

IEHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IEHC and IBIDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IEHC and IBIDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEHC
1D Price
Change %
IEHC100%
N/A
IBIDF - IEHC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPDYY - IEHC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - IEHC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - IEHC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNNDF - IEHC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGBLY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGBLY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGBLY
1D Price
Change %
KGBLY100%
N/A
IEHC - KGBLY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KULR - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
IBIDF - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More