IEGCF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
22.01M
MMRGF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.04 (+21.05%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
96.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEGCF vs MMRGF

Header iconIEGCF vs MMRGF Comparison
Open Charts IEGCF vs MMRGFBanner chart's image
Independence Gold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$909.21K
Capitalization22.01M
Minaurum Gold
Price$0.23
Change+$0.04 (+21.05%)
Volume$575.99K
Capitalization96.78M
IEGCF vs MMRGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IEGCF vs. MMRGF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEGCF is a Hold and MMRGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (IEGCF: $0.10 vs. MMRGF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: IEGCF and MMRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IEGCF: 325% vs. MMRGF: 260%
Market capitalization -- IEGCF: $22.01M vs. MMRGF: $96.78M
IEGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.01M. MMRGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $96.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $86.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IEGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the long-term than MMRGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IEGCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMRGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMRGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMRGF is a better buy in the short-term than IEGCF.

Price Growth

IEGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.21% price change this week, while MMRGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +15.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3881.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMRGF($96.8M) has a higher market cap than IEGCF($22M). MMRGF YTD gains are higher at: 96.777 vs. IEGCF (-25.570). MMRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.76M vs. IEGCF (-7.22M). IEGCF has more cash in the bank: 7.49M vs. MMRGF (1.72M). IEGCF (0) and MMRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IEGCFMMRGFIEGCF / MMRGF
Capitalization22M96.8M23%
EBITDA-7.22M-3.76M192%
Gain YTD-25.57096.777-26%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.49M1.72M434%
Total Debt217KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IEGCF vs MMRGF: Fundamental Ratings
IEGCF
MMRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IEGCF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (74). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (100). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

MMRGF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (99). This means that MMRGF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MMRGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (62). This means that MMRGF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MMRGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (100). This means that MMRGF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEGCFMMRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBDBY0.630.01
+1.61%
Companhia Brasileira de Distribuicao
POLBF0.04N/A
N/A
Poolbeg Pharma Plc
PLXNF21.49N/A
N/A
PLUXEE N V
GJNSF17.52N/A
N/A
Gjensidige Forsikring Asa
TAPM0.34N/A
N/A
Tapinator, Inc.

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IEGCF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IEGCF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
-1.97%
AUMBF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
EDVMF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
MMRGF - IEGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+17.35%
FDMIF - IEGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+9.45%
JAGGF - IEGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
More

MMRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMRGF and LGDTF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMRGF and LGDTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMRGF
1D Price
Change %
MMRGF100%
+17.35%
LGDTF - MMRGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
IEGCF - MMRGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
FDMIF - MMRGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+9.45%
HSTXF - MMRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.24%
GGLDF - MMRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.77%
More