Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IEFA vs QINT
IEFA vs QINT Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs QINT
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$94.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
Volume$6.2K
Net Assets173.47B
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$68.18
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
Volume$172
Net Assets506.79M
IEFA vs QINT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. QINT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and QINT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 173B vs. QINT (507M). QINT has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: QINT (6.326) vs IEFA (5.757). IEFA was incepted earlier than QINT: IEFA (13 years) vs QINT (7 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QINT (0.40). QINT has a higher turnover IEFA (3.00) vs IEFA (3.00).
| IEFA | QINT | IEFA / QINT | |
| Gain YTD | 5.757 | 6.326 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 173B | 507M | 34,122% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.40 | 18% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 78.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 3.38 | 2.54 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
More | ||||
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| SAN - QINT | 74% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| MFC - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| MT - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||