| IDMO | IMTM | IDMO / IMTM | |
| Gain YTD | 2.699 | 4.482 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 3.7B | 71% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.30 | 83% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 109.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 1.96 | 2.31 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| IDMO | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | about 1 month ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QDPL | 43.06 | 0.12 | +0.28% |
| Pacer Metaurus US Lg Cp Dvd Mltp 400 ETF | |||
| AAAA | 27.79 | 0.05 | +0.18% |
| Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF | |||
| RMCA | 24.31 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
| Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| CLOX | 25.55 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Eldridge AAA CLO ETF | |||
| DYTA | 29.48 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
| SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDMO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IDMO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IDMO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDMO | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| BN - IDMO | 71% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| MFC - IDMO | 71% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| NWG - IDMO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| FER - IDMO | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| BBVA - IDMO | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| SAN - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| MFC - IMTM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| BN - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| STM - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| NWG - IMTM | 66% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||