IDKFF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.41M
RMGOF
Price
$7.97
Change
-$1.31 (-14.12%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
Capitalization
5.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDKFF vs RMGOF

Header iconIDKFF vs RMGOF Comparison
Open Charts IDKFF vs RMGOFBanner chart's image
ThreeD Capital
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.71K
Capitalization4.41M
Remgro
Price$7.97
Change-$1.31 (-14.12%)
Volume$4.23K
Capitalization5.51B
IDKFF vs RMGOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDKFF vs. RMGOF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDKFF is a Hold and RMGOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (IDKFF: $0.06 vs. RMGOF: $7.97)
Brand notoriety: IDKFF and RMGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDKFF: 21% vs. RMGOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IDKFF: $4.41M vs. RMGOF: $5.51B
IDKFF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.41M. RMGOF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDKFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMGOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IDKFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMGOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMGOF is a better buy in the long-term than IDKFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDKFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMGOF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDKFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMGOF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMGOF is a better buy in the short-term than IDKFF.

Price Growth

IDKFF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.56% price change this week, while RMGOF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGOF($5.51B) has a higher market cap than IDKFF($4.41M). RMGOF has higher P/E ratio than IDKFF: RMGOF (104.82) vs IDKFF (2.11). RMGOF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. IDKFF (-53.498).
IDKFFRMGOFIDKFF / RMGOF
Capitalization4.41M5.51B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-53.4980.000-
P/E Ratio2.11104.822%
Revenue-19.72MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt381KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDKFF vs RMGOF: Fundamental Ratings
IDKFF
RMGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8749
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10029
SMR RATING
1..100
9697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8773
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMGOF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDKFF (70). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IDKFF (100). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew significantly faster than IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

IDKFF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGOF (97). This means that IDKFF’s stock grew similarly to RMGOF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGOF's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (87). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGOF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDKFF (100). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDKFFRMGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OGS80.192.65
+3.42%
ONE GAS
ARKR7.300.18
+2.53%
Ark Restaurants Corp
URI947.2716.02
+1.72%
United Rentals
RGCO22.72-0.08
-0.35%
RGC Resources
PHAR13.79-1.01
-6.82%
Pharming Group NV

IDKFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDKFF and RMGOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDKFF and RMGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDKFF
1D Price
Change %
IDKFF100%
+3.54%
RMGOF - IDKFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPZYF - IDKFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LBGUF - IDKFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNF - IDKFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.78%
JBAXY - IDKFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More

RMGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGOF and HFAHF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGOF and HFAHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGOF
1D Price
Change %
RMGOF100%
N/A
HFAHF - RMGOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDKFF - RMGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
EQS - RMGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
PNXPF - RMGOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOLCF - RMGOF
6%
Poorly correlated
+14.00%
More