IDKFF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.16M
LBGUF
Price
$45.79
Change
+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.54B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDKFF vs LBGUF

Header iconIDKFF vs LBGUF Comparison
Open Charts IDKFF vs LBGUFBanner chart's image
ThreeD Capital
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$74.09K
Capitalization4.16M
LE Lundbergfoeretagen AB
Price$45.79
Change+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.54B
IDKFF vs LBGUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDKFF vs. LBGUF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDKFF is a Hold and LBGUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (IDKFF: $0.05 vs. LBGUF: $45.79)
Brand notoriety: IDKFF and LBGUF are both not notable
IDKFF represents the Investment Managers, while LBGUF is part of the Industrial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDKFF: 120% vs. LBGUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IDKFF: $4.16M vs. LBGUF: $12.54B
IDKFF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.16M. LBGUF’s [@Industrial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $12.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $136.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $14.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDKFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLBGUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IDKFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LBGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBGUF is a better buy in the long-term than IDKFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDKFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IDKFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

IDKFF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +9.70% price change this week, while LBGUF (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Industrial Conglomerates (-0.57% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBGUF($12.5B) has a higher market cap than IDKFF($4.16M). LBGUF has higher P/E ratio than IDKFF: LBGUF (21.07) vs IDKFF (2.11). LBGUF YTD gains are higher at: -13.775 vs. IDKFF (-56.312). IDKFF has less debt than LBGUF: IDKFF (381K) vs LBGUF (20.6B). LBGUF has higher revenues than IDKFF: LBGUF (31.7B) vs IDKFF (-19.72M).
IDKFFLBGUFIDKFF / LBGUF
Capitalization4.16M12.5B0%
EBITDAN/A11.2B-
Gain YTD-56.312-13.775409%
P/E Ratio2.1121.0710%
Revenue-19.72M31.7B-0%
Total CashN/A1.28B-
Total Debt381K20.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDKFF vs LBGUF: Fundamental Ratings
IDKFF
LBGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LBGUF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (69). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

LBGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (100). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

IDKFF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (98). This means that IDKFF’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

LBGUF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (65). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

LBGUF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IDKFF (100). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew significantly faster than IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDKFFLBGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRWD1.150.05
+5.00%
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals
INDI4.300.02
+0.47%
indie Semiconductor
ETR87.75-0.43
-0.49%
Entergy Corporation
GDHG7.51-0.29
-3.72%
Golden Heaven Group Holdings Ltd
CRC49.03-2.52
-4.89%
California Resources Corp

IDKFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDKFF and RMGOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDKFF and RMGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDKFF
1D Price
Change %
IDKFF100%
+5.69%
RMGOF - IDKFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPZYF - IDKFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LBGUF - IDKFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNF - IDKFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
JBAXY - IDKFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More

LBGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBGUF and CION have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBGUF and CION's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBGUF
1D Price
Change %
LBGUF100%
N/A
CION - LBGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
BX - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
NMFC - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
AMDUF - LBGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPUF - LBGUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More