Advertisement
IDCC vs ZM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCC is a Buy and ZM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IDCC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IDCC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IDCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IDCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
IDCC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.92% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
IDCC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
ZM is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| IDCC | ZM | IDCC / ZM | |
| Capitalization | 7.43B | 25B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 652M | 983M | 66% |
| Gain YTD | 49.792 | 2.536 | 1,963% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.44 | 22.02 | 93% |
| Revenue | 893M | 4.7B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 937M | 7.79B | 12% |
| Total Debt | 488M | 61.5M | 793% |
IDCC | ZM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IDCC's Valuation (22) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (71) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew significantly faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's SMR Rating (19) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ZM (47) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.
| IDCC | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 57% | 12 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CTEC | 44.78 | 1.46 | +3.36% |
| Global X CleanTech ETF | |||
| SMAP | 25.08 | 0.48 | +1.97% |
| Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | |||
| INMU | 23.65 | 0.12 | +0.50% |
| iShares Intermediate Muni Income Act ETF | |||
| IBTK | 19.94 | 0.05 | +0.25% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Trsry ETF | |||
| FBCG | 51.37 | -0.30 | -0.58% |
| Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | |||
IDCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCC has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IDCC jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IDCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDCC | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| ACIW - IDCC | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| ALRM - IDCC | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| QTWO - IDCC | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| ZETA - IDCC | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| ZM - IDCC | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||
ZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.