IDCC
Price
$344.68
Change
+$5.74 (+1.69%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.75B
34 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$84.13
Change
+$0.14 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 26, 12:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.14B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCC vs ZM

Header iconIDCC vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts IDCC vs ZMBanner chart's image
InterDigital
Price$344.68
Change+$5.74 (+1.69%)
Volume$331
Capitalization8.75B
Zoom Communications
Price$84.13
Change+$0.14 (+0.17%)
Volume$200
Capitalization25.14B
IDCC vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCC vs. ZM commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCC is a StrongBuy and ZM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCC: $338.94 vs. ZM: $83.99)
Brand notoriety: IDCC: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCC: 283% vs. ZM: 70%
Market capitalization -- IDCC: $8.75B vs. ZM: $25.14B
IDCC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.75B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IDCC is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IDCC and ZM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IDCC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

IDCC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($25.1B) has a higher market cap than IDCC($8.75B). IDCC has higher P/E ratio than ZM: IDCC (24.07) vs ZM (22.10). IDCC YTD gains are higher at: 76.408 vs. ZM (2.916). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. IDCC (652M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 7.78B vs. IDCC (937M). ZM has less debt than IDCC: ZM (54.3M) vs IDCC (488M). ZM has higher revenues than IDCC: ZM (4.75B) vs IDCC (893M).
IDCCZMIDCC / ZM
Capitalization8.75B25.1B35%
EBITDA652M1.11B59%
Gain YTD76.4082.9162,620%
P/E Ratio24.0722.10109%
Revenue893M4.75B19%
Total Cash937M7.78B12%
Total Debt488M54.3M899%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCC vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
IDCC
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2100
SMR RATING
1..100
1957
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a3

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCC's Valuation (24) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (71) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

IDCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew significantly faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

IDCC's SMR Rating (19) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (57) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

IDCC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ZM (51) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

IDCC's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCCZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UVIX10.680.27
+2.59%
2x Long VIX Futures ETF
ITDJ28.55N/A
N/A
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF
BBAX55.19-0.07
-0.13%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Dev APAC ex-JpnETF
SIXF30.90-0.07
-0.23%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Feb/Aug ETF
CGO12.08-0.13
-1.06%
Calamos Global Total Return Fund

IDCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCC has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IDCC jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCC
1D Price
Change %
IDCC100%
-2.05%
ACIW - IDCC
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
QTWO - IDCC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
ALRM - IDCC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
ZM - IDCC
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
ZETA - IDCC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
More