IDCC
Price
$284.77
Change
+$7.28 (+2.62%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.35B
56 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$77.40
Change
+$0.67 (+0.87%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.83B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCC vs QTWO

Header iconIDCC vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts IDCC vs QTWOBanner chart's image
InterDigital
Price$284.77
Change+$7.28 (+2.62%)
Volume$353.92K
Capitalization7.35B
Q2 Holdings
Price$77.40
Change+$0.67 (+0.87%)
Volume$639.43K
Capitalization4.83B
IDCC vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCC vs. QTWO commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCC is a Buy and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCC: $284.77 vs. QTWO: $77.40)
Brand notoriety: IDCC and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCC: 131% vs. QTWO: 84%
Market capitalization -- IDCC: $7.35B vs. QTWO: $4.83B
IDCC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.35B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IDCC is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IDCC is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

IDCC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.60% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

IDCC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCC($7.35B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($4.83B). QTWO has higher P/E ratio than IDCC: QTWO (1290.00) vs IDCC (20.23). IDCC YTD gains are higher at: 48.215 vs. QTWO (-23.100). IDCC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 652M vs. QTWO (77.5M). IDCC has more cash in the bank: 937M vs. QTWO (532M). IDCC has less debt than QTWO: IDCC (488M) vs QTWO (539M). IDCC has higher revenues than QTWO: IDCC (893M) vs QTWO (743M).
IDCCQTWOIDCC / QTWO
Capitalization7.35B4.83B152%
EBITDA652M77.5M841%
Gain YTD48.215-23.100-209%
P/E Ratio20.231290.002%
Revenue893M743M120%
Total Cash937M532M176%
Total Debt488M539M91%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCC vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
IDCC
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
134
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2100
SMR RATING
1..100
1991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1555
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCC's Valuation (22) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

IDCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

IDCC's SMR Rating (19) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

IDCC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as QTWO (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

IDCC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (55) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCCQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBRE94.050.43
+0.46%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
ITDC33.010.09
+0.26%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF
HYGW30.150.07
+0.23%
iShares High Yld Crp Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF
CADRUB58.43N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - Russia Ruble
IONX56.24-5.60
-9.06%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF

IDCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCC has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IDCC jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCC
1D Price
Change %
IDCC100%
+2.62%
ACIW - IDCC
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
ALRM - IDCC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
QTWO - IDCC
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
ZETA - IDCC
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
SHOP - IDCC
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+0.87%
FRSH - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
HUBS - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
ALKT - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
RDVT - QTWO
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
More