IDCBF
Price
$0.80
Change
+$0.10 (+14.29%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
353.11B
SMFG
Price
$15.74
Change
-$0.04 (-0.25%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
99.37B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs SMFG

Header iconIDCBF vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.80
Change+$0.10 (+14.29%)
Volume$1.26K
Capitalization353.11B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$15.74
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
Volume$1.27M
Capitalization99.37B
IDCBF vs SMFG Comparison Chart in %
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. SMFG commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a StrongBuy and SMFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.80 vs. SMFG: $15.74)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and SMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 23% vs. SMFG: 63%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $353.11B vs. SMFG: $99.37B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $353.11B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $99.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $810.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $132.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the long-term than IDCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а +10.20% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($353B) has a higher market cap than SMFG($99.4B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: SMFG (13.00) vs IDCBF (5.86). IDCBF YTD gains are higher at: 27.691 vs. SMFG (8.627). IDCBF has less debt than SMFG: IDCBF (3.19T) vs SMFG (31.54T). SMFG has higher revenues than IDCBF: SMFG (5.11T) vs IDCBF (823B).
IDCBFSMFGIDCBF / SMFG
Capitalization353B99.4B355%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.6918.627321%
P/E Ratio5.8613.0045%
Revenue823B5.11T16%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.19T31.54T10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8772
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5116
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1839
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (72) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IDCBF (76) in the null industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (51) in the null industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IDCBF (1) in the null industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IDCBF (62) in the null industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFG (39) in the Major Banks industry. This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USAC23.080.43
+1.90%
USA Compression Partners LP
WST270.603.41
+1.28%
West Pharmaceutical Services
BBGI5.57-0.07
-1.33%
Beasley Broadcast Group Inc
ARMP3.40-0.09
-2.58%
Armata Pharmaceuticals
BLMN7.41-0.24
-3.14%
Bloomin' Brands

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and BCS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and BCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
+14.19%
BCS - IDCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
SMFG - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
INGVF - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUFG - IDCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
NAUBF - IDCBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
-0.25%
MUFG - SMFG
83%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
BCS - SMFG
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
C - SMFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
BAC - SMFG
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
UBS - SMFG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
More