IDCBF
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
223.08B
SCBFF
Price
$16.32
Change
-$0.16 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
26.81B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs SCBFF

Header iconIDCBF vs SCBFF Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs SCBFFBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$65K
Capitalization223.08B
Standard Chartered
Price$16.32
Change-$0.16 (-0.97%)
Volume$3.64K
Capitalization26.81B
IDCBF vs SCBFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. SCBFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a Buy and SCBFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.80 vs. SCBFF: $16.32)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and SCBFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 541% vs. SCBFF: 54%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $223.08B vs. SCBFF: $26.81B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $223.08B. SCBFF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SCBFF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the long-term than IDCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCBFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.56% price change this week, while SCBFF (@Major Banks) price change was +4.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCBFF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+3.36% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($223B) has a higher market cap than SCBFF($26.8B). SCBFF has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: SCBFF (9.82) vs IDCBF (3.49). SCBFF YTD gains are higher at: 39.333 vs. IDCBF (28.123). SCBFF has less debt than IDCBF: SCBFF (93.9B) vs IDCBF (1.65T). IDCBF has higher revenues than SCBFF: IDCBF (911B) vs SCBFF (17.1B).
IDCBFSCBFFIDCBF / SCBFF
Capitalization223B26.8B832%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.12339.33371%
P/E Ratio3.499.8236%
Revenue911B17.1B5,327%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.65T93.9B1,753%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs SCBFF: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
SCBFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6611
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFF (28). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (66). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFF (6). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (44). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (19). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFSCBFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATOM5.020.10
+2.03%
Atomera
NWG14.050.17
+1.22%
NatWest Group plc
BOSC4.860.04
+0.83%
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions
BLFS21.490.12
+0.56%
BioLife Solutions
SWTX46.98-0.01
-0.02%
SpringWorks Therapeutics

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
N/A
IDCBY - IDCBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
MBFJF - IDCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
SCBFF - IDCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
NAUBF - IDCBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NABZY - IDCBF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
More

SCBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFF has been loosely correlated with SCBFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFF jumps, then SCBFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFF
1D Price
Change %
SCBFF100%
-0.94%
SCBFY - SCBFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
MBFJF - SCBFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
NTIOF - SCBFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
IDCBY - SCBFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
NAUBF - SCBFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More