IDCBF
Price
$0.80
Change
+$0.02 (+2.56%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
356.28B
MBFJF
Price
$14.55
Change
+$0.15 (+1.04%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
164.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs MBFJF

Header iconIDCBF vs MBFJF Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs MBFJFBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.80
Change+$0.02 (+2.56%)
Volume$31.32K
Capitalization356.28B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$14.55
Change+$0.15 (+1.04%)
Volume$2.21K
Capitalization164.17B
IDCBF vs MBFJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. MBFJF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a StrongBuy and MBFJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.80 vs. MBFJF: $14.55)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and MBFJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 93% vs. MBFJF: 1%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $356.28B vs. MBFJF: $164.17B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $356.28B. MBFJF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $164.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $796.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBFJF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBFJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBFJF is a better buy in the long-term than IDCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBFJF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MBFJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IDCBF is a better buy in the short-term than MBFJF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а +5.51% price change this week, while MBFJF (@Major Banks) price change was +5.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.02% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($356B) has a higher market cap than MBFJF($164B). MBFJF has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: MBFJF (13.46) vs IDCBF (5.92). MBFJF YTD gains are higher at: 36.620 vs. IDCBF (28.123). IDCBF has less debt than MBFJF: IDCBF (3.04T) vs MBFJF (46.04T). MBFJF has higher revenues than IDCBF: MBFJF (6.84T) vs IDCBF (810B).
IDCBFMBFJFIDCBF / MBFJF
Capitalization356B164B217%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.12336.62077%
P/E Ratio5.9213.4644%
Revenue810B6.84T12%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.04T46.04T7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs MBFJF: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
MBFJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9864
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5916
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1830
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (87). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (59). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (1). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (46). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (30). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFMBFJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FARM1.720.04
+2.38%
Farmer Brothers Company
LFCR7.22-0.02
-0.28%
Lifecore Biomedical
CRAI185.43-0.99
-0.53%
CRA International
FMX86.22-0.64
-0.74%
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB DE CV
STVN21.85-1.78
-7.53%
Stevanato Group SpA

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
+7.45%
IDCBY - IDCBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
MBFJF - IDCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
SCBFF - IDCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
NAUBF - IDCBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NABZY - IDCBF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More

MBFJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBFJF and BACHY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBFJF and BACHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBFJF
1D Price
Change %
MBFJF100%
+1.04%
BACHY - MBFJF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
RBSPF - MBFJF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
NABZY - MBFJF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
SCBFF - MBFJF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
INGVF - MBFJF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More