IDCBF
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
345.06B
MBFJF
Price
$15.53
Change
+$0.14 (+0.91%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
173.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs MBFJF

Header iconIDCBF vs MBFJF Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs MBFJFBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization345.06B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$15.53
Change+$0.14 (+0.91%)
Volume$535.96K
Capitalization173.99B
IDCBF vs MBFJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. MBFJF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a Hold and MBFJF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.75 vs. MBFJF: $15.52)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and MBFJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 4% vs. MBFJF: 126%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $345.06B vs. MBFJF: $173.99B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $345.06B. MBFJF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $173.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBFJF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBFJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBFJF is a better buy in the long-term than IDCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBFJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MBFJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IDCBF is a better buy in the short-term than MBFJF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MBFJF (@Major Banks) price change was -0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($345B) has a higher market cap than MBFJF($174B). MBFJF has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: MBFJF (14.40) vs IDCBF (5.52). MBFJF YTD gains are higher at: 45.775 vs. IDCBF (20.115). IDCBF has less debt than MBFJF: IDCBF (3.04T) vs MBFJF (46.25T). MBFJF has higher revenues than IDCBF: MBFJF (6.72T) vs IDCBF (810B).
IDCBFMBFJFIDCBF / MBFJF
Capitalization345B174B198%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.11545.77544%
P/E Ratio5.5214.4038%
Revenue810B6.72T12%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.04T46.25T7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs MBFJF: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
MBFJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6614
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a9

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (87). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (66). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (1). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (53). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (30). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFMBFJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDCX1.880.05
+2.73%
Medicus Pharma Ltd
LEA111.050.68
+0.62%
Lear Corp
PKBK22.470.03
+0.13%
Parke Bancorp
MO66.55-0.04
-0.06%
Altria Group
BBSI48.14-1.03
-2.09%
Barrett Business Services Inc.

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
N/A
IDCBY - IDCBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
MBFJF - IDCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SCBFF - IDCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
NAUBF - IDCBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
NABZY - IDCBF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More

MBFJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBFJF and BACHY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBFJF and BACHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBFJF
1D Price
Change %
MBFJF100%
+0.98%
BACHY - MBFJF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
RBSPF - MBFJF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
NABZY - MBFJF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
SCBFF - MBFJF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
INGVF - MBFJF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More