ICPVF
Price
$1.62
Change
+$0.07 (+4.52%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.92B
JMPLF
Price
$24.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICPVF vs JMPLF

Header iconICPVF vs JMPLF Comparison
Open Charts ICPVF vs JMPLFBanner chart's image
Dyno Nobel
Price$1.62
Change+$0.07 (+4.52%)
Volume$1
Capitalization3.92B
Johnson Matthey
Price$24.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$120
Capitalization4.25B
ICPVF vs JMPLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICPVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JMPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICPVF vs. JMPLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICPVF is a Hold and JMPLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ICPVF: $1.62 vs. JMPLF: $24.00)
Brand notoriety: ICPVF and JMPLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICPVF: 0% vs. JMPLF: 29%
Market capitalization -- ICPVF: $3.92B vs. JMPLF: $4.25B
ICPVF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.92B. JMPLF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICPVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJMPLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ICPVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JMPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICPVF is a better buy in the long-term than JMPLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICPVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JMPLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICPVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • JMPLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICPVF is a better buy in the short-term than JMPLF.

Price Growth

ICPVF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JMPLF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+3.00% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JMPLF($4.25B) has a higher market cap than ICPVF($3.92B). JMPLF has higher P/E ratio than ICPVF: JMPLF (12.22) vs ICPVF (7.81). JMPLF YTD gains are higher at: 41.260 vs. ICPVF (-13.425). ICPVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. JMPLF (621M). ICPVF has more cash in the bank: 764M vs. JMPLF (650M). JMPLF has less debt than ICPVF: JMPLF (1.66B) vs ICPVF (1.96B). JMPLF has higher revenues than ICPVF: JMPLF (14.9B) vs ICPVF (6.37B).
ICPVFJMPLFICPVF / JMPLF
Capitalization3.92B4.25B92%
EBITDA1.48B621M239%
Gain YTD-13.42541.260-33%
P/E Ratio7.8112.2264%
Revenue6.37B14.9B43%
Total Cash764M650M118%
Total Debt1.96B1.66B118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICPVF vs JMPLF: Fundamental Ratings
ICPVF
JMPLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
9579
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICPVF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as JMPLF (31). This means that ICPVF’s stock grew similarly to JMPLF’s over the last 12 months.

ICPVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as JMPLF (100). This means that ICPVF’s stock grew similarly to JMPLF’s over the last 12 months.

JMPLF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as ICPVF (95). This means that JMPLF’s stock grew similarly to ICPVF’s over the last 12 months.

JMPLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ICPVF (61). This means that JMPLF’s stock grew similarly to ICPVF’s over the last 12 months.

ICPVF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JMPLF (98). This means that ICPVF’s stock grew significantly faster than JMPLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICPVFJMPLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICPVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JMPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXL159.921.71
+1.08%
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® ETF
BLCR36.560.34
+0.95%
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF
GJUL38.940.14
+0.36%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jul
PDBA34.530.03
+0.09%
Invesco Agriculture Cmdty Str No K-1ETF
HFSI34.87-0.02
-0.06%
Hartford Strategic Income ETF

ICPVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICPVF and SGLFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICPVF and SGLFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICPVF
1D Price
Change %
ICPVF100%
N/A
SGLFF - ICPVF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMPLF - ICPVF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GVDNY - ICPVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
GVDBF - ICPVF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLGI - ICPVF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More

JMPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JMPLF and ALTO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JMPLF and ALTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMPLF
1D Price
Change %
JMPLF100%
N/A
ALTO - JMPLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
EVKIF - JMPLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APD - JMPLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
ICPVF - JMPLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBLB - JMPLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More