65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOW vs WDS
ICOW vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts ICOW vs WDS
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$35.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.53%)
Volume$86.57K
Net Assets1.23B
Woodside Energy Group
Price$17.50
Change-$0.08 (-0.46%)
Volume$584.96K
Capitalization33.36B
ICOW vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOW vs. WDS commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOW is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WDS: Fundamental Ratings
WDS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOW | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| MT - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 69% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 68% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 67% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||
WDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with HES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then HES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDS | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| HES - WDS | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VET - WDS | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| FANG - WDS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CHRD - WDS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| CNQ - WDS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||