64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOW vs WDS
ICOW vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts ICOW vs WDS
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$34.30
Change+$0.30 (+0.88%)
Volume$149
Net Assets1.14B
Woodside Energy Group
Price$16.71
Change+$0.41 (+2.52%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization37.83B
ICOW vs WDS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOW vs. WDS commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOW is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WDS: Fundamental Ratings
WDS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOW | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 26 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 74% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 71% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 69% Closely correlated | +5.43% | ||
More | ||||
WDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with FANG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then FANG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDS | 100% | +5.43% | ||
| FANG - WDS | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| VET - WDS | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.04% | ||
| CHRD - WDS | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| CNQ - WDS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| HES - WDS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||