73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOW vs SHEL
ICOW vs SHEL Comparison
Open Charts ICOW vs SHEL
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$35.59
Change-$0.13 (-0.36%)
Volume$277
Net Assets1.23B
ICOW vs SHEL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOW vs. SHEL commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOW is a Hold and SHEL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHEL: Fundamental Ratings
SHEL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOW | SHEL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| MT - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 69% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 68% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 67% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||
SHEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHEL has been closely correlated with E. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHEL jumps, then E could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHEL | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| E - SHEL | 83% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| TTE - SHEL | 79% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| SU - SHEL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| BP - SHEL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| XOM - SHEL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||