Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOP vs XME
ICOP vs XME Comparison
Open Charts ICOP vs XME
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$38.09
Change-$1.24 (-3.15%)
Volume$89.54K
Net Assets105.66M
SPDR® S&P Metals and Mining ETF
Price$102.26
Change-$4.35 (-4.08%)
Volume$4.29M
Net Assets3.42B
ICOP vs XME Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOP vs. XME commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOP is a Hold and XME is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 3.42B vs. ICOP (106M). XME has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOP: XME (80.861) vs ICOP (50.796). ICOP was incepted earlier than XME: ICOP (2 years) vs XME (19 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than ICOP (0.47).
| ICOP | XME | ICOP / XME | |
| Gain YTD | 50.796 | 80.861 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 106M | 3.42B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 1.92 | 0.35 | 551% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOP | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -3.15% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 80% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 51% Loosely correlated | -7.63% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| TKO - ICOP | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.77% |
XME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CMC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XME | 100% | -4.08% | ||
| CMC - XME | 70% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| STLD - XME | 69% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| KALU - XME | 69% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| AA - XME | 69% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| NUE - XME | 68% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||