Intraday BUY SELL Signals
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOP vs TKO
ICOP vs TKO Comparison
Open Charts ICOP vs TKO
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$45.78
Change+$0.99 (+2.21%)
Volume$200
Net Assets155.92M
TKO Group Holdings
Price$217.48
Change-$0.50 (-0.23%)
Volume$2.41K
Capitalization17.2B
ICOP vs TKO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOP vs. TKO commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOP is a Hold and TKO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOP | TKO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MRSK | 37.26 | 0.19 | +0.51% |
| Toews Agility Managed Risk ETF | |||
| BSJW | 25.78 | 0.04 | +0.17% |
| Invesco BulltShr 2032 Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
| DAGXF | 1.95 | N/A | N/A |
| Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) | |||
| PHDG | 37.75 | N/A | -0.01% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Downside Hedged ETF | |||
| USD | 54.00 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | |||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 81% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| TKO - ICOP | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.51% |
TKO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKO has been loosely correlated with LLYVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TKO jumps, then LLYVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKO | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| LLYVA - TKO | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NWS - TKO | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| LYV - TKO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| NWSA - TKO | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| FWONA - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||