Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICMVX vs RLBFX
ICMVX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ICMVX vs RLBFX
Intrepid Capital Institutional
Price$13.49
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.98M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
ICMVX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICMVX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICMVX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. ICMVX (101M). ICMVX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: ICMVX (2.58) vs RLBFX (2.08). ICMVX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ICMVX (15 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ICMVX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ICMVX (33.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICMVX: RLBFX (250) vs ICMVX (250000). ICMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.99 vs. RLBFX (8.29). ICMVX return over 5 years is better than : 59.68 vs. RLBFX (39.76).
| ICMVX | RLBFX | ICMVX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.109 | 9.922 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.08 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.99 | 8.29 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.76 | 30.56 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.68 | 39.76 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.43 | 69.21 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement