It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ICL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUAN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ICL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while UAN (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +6.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.80%.
ICL is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.
UAN is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
ICL | UAN | ICL / UAN | |
Capitalization | 7.94B | 965M | 823% |
EBITDA | 1.36B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 25.509 | 31.684 | 81% |
P/E Ratio | 21.31 | 10.97 | 194% |
Revenue | 6.87B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 433M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 2.43B | 574M | 423% |
ICL | UAN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UAN's Valuation (2) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ICL (28). This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (64). This means that UAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's SMR Rating (35) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (80). This means that UAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ICL (57). This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.
ICL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for UAN (85). This means that ICL’s stock grew significantly faster than UAN’s over the last 12 months.
ICL | UAN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago63% | 4 days ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago63% | 4 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 17 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago64% | 4 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago54% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
QTR | 34.38 | 0.47 | +1.38% |
Global X NASDAQ 100® Tail Risk ETF | |||
AUGP | 29.82 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Aug | |||
EASG | 34.16 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Eq ETF | |||
TDVG | 43.17 | -0.05 | -0.12% |
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | |||
AVMV | 68.06 | -0.48 | -0.70% |
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UAN has been loosely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UAN jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.