ICL
Price
$6.80
Change
-$0.04 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.55B
10 days until earnings call
NITO
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.03 (-8.82%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICL vs NITO

Header iconICL vs NITO Comparison
Open Charts ICL vs NITOBanner chart's image
ICL Group
Price$6.80
Change-$0.04 (-0.58%)
Volume$332.47K
Capitalization6.55B
N2OFF
Price$0.31
Change-$0.03 (-8.82%)
Volume$4.5M
Capitalization3.87M
ICL vs NITO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NITO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICL vs. NITO commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICL is a Hold and NITO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ICL: $6.80 vs. NITO: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: ICL and NITO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICL: 46% vs. NITO: 245%
Market capitalization -- ICL: $6.55B vs. NITO: $3.87M
ICL [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $6.55B. NITO’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $3.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNITO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ICL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NITO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICL is a better buy in the long-term than NITO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NITO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NITO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ICL and NITO are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -1.02% price change this week, while NITO (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +22.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +4.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+4.56% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICL($6.55B) has a higher market cap than NITO($3.87M). ICL has higher P/E ratio than NITO: ICL (10.64) vs NITO (0.07). ICL YTD gains are higher at: 39.454 vs. NITO (24.597).
ICLNITOICL / NITO
Capitalization6.55B3.87M169,137%
EBITDA1.67BN/A-
Gain YTD39.45424.597160%
P/E Ratio10.640.0715,863%
Revenue7.54BN/A-
Total Cash592MN/A-
Total Debt2.69BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICL vs NITO: Fundamental Ratings
ICL
NITO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6639
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
7998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1360
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICL's Valuation (36) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (77) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (100) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's SMR Rating (79) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NITO (98) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NITO (60) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (60) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICLNITO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NITO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBX14.571.54
+11.82%
MBX Biosciences Inc.
LPSN1.020.01
+0.99%
LivePerson
CYBR378.723.38
+0.90%
CyberArk Software Ltd
SUNE1.65N/A
N/A
SUNation Energy Inc
FUN31.72N/A
N/A
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

ICL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICL
1D Price
Change %
ICL100%
-0.58%
MOS - ICL
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
NTR - ICL
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
CTVA - ICL
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
IPI - ICL
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
CF - ICL
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

NITO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NITO and MULG have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NITO and MULG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NITO
1D Price
Change %
NITO100%
-7.90%
MULG - NITO
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICL - NITO
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
NTR - NITO
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
BIOX - NITO
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
CTVA - NITO
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More