Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs TRCLX
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs TRCLX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.89M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. ICHKX (26.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: TRCLX (1.36) vs ICHKX (0.86). ICHKX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ICHKX (32 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ICHKX (1.94). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. ICHKX (8.63). ICHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ICHKX (5000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.77 vs. ICHKX (25.85). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.47 vs. ICHKX (-31.94).
| ICHKX | TRCLX | ICHKX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.03 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.022 | 34.280 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9M | 62.5M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.85 | 33.77 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.30 | 28.39 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.94 | -6.47 | 494% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement