Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs TRCLX
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs TRCLX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.97
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.78M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.01
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. TRCLX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. ICHKX (27.8M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: TRCLX (1.64) vs ICHKX (1.06). ICHKX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ICHKX (32 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ICHKX (1.94). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. ICHKX (8.63). ICHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ICHKX (5000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.31 vs. ICHKX (39.65). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.36 vs. ICHKX (-36.64).
| ICHKX | TRCLX | ICHKX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.03 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.367 | 6.078 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.8M | 66.9M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.64 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.65 | 49.31 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.97 | 23.22 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.64 | -6.36 | 576% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement