Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs TRCLX
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs TRCLX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.84M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55M
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 63.5M vs. ICHKX (27.8M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: TRCLX (1.34) vs ICHKX (0.86). ICHKX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ICHKX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ICHKX (1.94). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. ICHKX (8.63). ICHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ICHKX (5000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX (30.01) and ICHKX (29.98) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.40 vs. ICHKX (-31.41).
| ICHKX | TRCLX | ICHKX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.03 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.046 | 33.144 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.8M | 63.5M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.34 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.98 | 30.01 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.79 | 33.50 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.41 | -6.40 | 491% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement